Economy

Letter to the Editor: WSD’s Prediction of a $200 Price Drop Not That Farfetched
Written by Tim Triplett
July 6, 2018
I would like to comment on the letter from the Midwestern Service Center Executive published in Steel Market Update’s July 5 newsletter. First, to call a decrease of $200/ton a “decrease of that magnitude” may have been the way to describe it 10 years ago, but in times where domestic mills have made increases in the range of $50-80/ton in one week, such a change in price is not unthinkable.
Sure, domestic supply is currently in good shape, but with prices above $1,000/ton compared with prices around the world that are $300/ton lower, one should expect more steel production to be built in the U.S. Isn’t that what the president wants? Several producers have already announced they will install additional capacity, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see a foreign steel producer build a mill in the U.S.
Although demand seems strong, it is not the main reason for these price increases. Even Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has realized that much of the price increases were based on the fact that imports have decreased substantially.
The big factor, obviously, is the uncertainty of the tariffs. I don’t quite understand why the Midwestern Executive stated that “termination of tariffs is highly unlikely.” Most of the programs of the past decades to protect the domestic steel industry have been short-lived, and I can’t see these tariffs lasting even one year.
Steel Trader
(Name withheld on request)

Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Economy

Steel, manufacturing, and union groups divided on S232 tariffs
Domestic steel trade associations, manufacturing groups, and the United Steelworkers (USW) union had mixed reactions to the implementation of new Section 232 tariffs without exclusions on Wednesday. Trade groups representing steel mills broadly supported President Trump’s actions, while the USW and some groups representing manufacturers were more critical. AISI Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of […]

CRU: Will US tariff policy be transactional or transformational?
The Trump 1.0 tariffs appeared to have little positive effect on the US manufacturing, partly because they hurt export competitiveness.

Beige Book finds mixed demand trends, tariff concerns
Manufacturing activity exhibited slight to modest increases across a majority of districts. However, manufacturers expressed concerns over the potential impact of looming trade policy changes between late January and February.

Construction spending drops marginally in January
Construction spending edged down slightly in January, slipping for the first time in four months. The US Census Bureau estimated spending at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $2,196 billion in January, down 0.2% from December’s downward revised rate. The January figure is 3.3% higher than a year ago. January’s result, despite the slight erosion, […]

ISM: Manufacturing expansion slowed in February
The Manufacturing PMI registered 50.3% in February. That’s 0.6 percentage points lower compared to the 50.9% recorded in January.