Trade Cases

AIIS: Steel Tariffs Have Begun to Take Effect

Written by Tim Triplett

June 28, 2018

Steel imports fell by nearly a quarter from April to May as the Trump administration’s steel tariffs began to take effect, reported the American Institute for International Steel (AIIS).

Imports fell 23.2 percent month-to-month to 2.89 million net tons, which was almost 16 percent lower than in May 2017. South Korea—which has agreed to a quota limiting its exports to the U.S.—recorded a decline of more than three-fourths from the preceding month and two-thirds from the previous May to 110,000 net tons. Imports from Russia fell by similar percentages to 114,000 net tons, and imports from Brazil decreased by more than a quarter from April and by nearly half from May of last year to 293,000 net tons. The European Union was exempted from the tariffs until June 1, and the 585,000 net tons of imports from that region showed growth of more than 22 percent on both a monthly and an annual basis. Canada and Mexico were also exempted until June 1, and while imports from Canada were largely unchanged from April at 710,000 net tons, imports from Mexico fell by 7 percent to 364,000 net tons. Both totals, though, were around one-fourth higher than in May 2017, in part because of strong growth from March to April in anticipation of the tariffs taking effect, AIIS said.

Through the first five months of the year, imports declined by 2.5 percent to 15.34 million net tons. Imports from Canada increased 16.8 percent to 3.15 million net tons and imports from the European Union grew by 12.7 percent to 2.2 million net tons, but imports from Brazil fell 12.3 percent to 1.8 million net tons. Imports from South Korea were largely unchanged at 1.53 million net tons, while imports from Mexico increased 18.4 percent to 1.7 million net tons.

“The administration will probably celebrate the May data, but businesses and consumers will not,” said AIIS President Richard Chriss. “Adding 25 percent to the cost of nearly every ton of steel that is brought into the country is a shortsighted tactic that will do long-term harm to the U.S. economy. That is why AIIS is going to court to challenge the tariffs and the faulty national security rationale that is being used to justify them. This administration may be unwilling to listen to economic arguments, but it will not be able to ignore legal ones.”

AIIS advocates for free trade on behalf of foreign producers, steel importers, exporters, distributors, consumers and related businesses.

Tim Triplett

Read more from Tim Triplett

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel

Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.

US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations

US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.

Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election

Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?