Trade Cases

Leibowitz on Trade: Product Exclusion Process Off to a Shaky Start

Written by Tim Triplett

June 26, 2018

Lewis Leibowitz, trade attorney and contributor to Steel Market Update, offers the following commentary on the latest developments in Washington:

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross reported to the Senate Finance Committee last week that companies had submitted 20,003 product exclusion requests for steel and 2,503 for aluminum, seeking relief from tariffs on products they maintain are not sufficiently available in the United States. The Trump administration has imposed a 25 percent tariff on steel imports and 10 percent tariff on aluminum imports. As of June 20, Commerce had posted 8,168 of the exclusion requests online and had rejected 2,513, in most cases stating there was “insufficient information to verify the product description and/or HTSUS code.”

“The applications were rejected for something as simple as an inaccurate Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) code. Use of the arcane HTS codes is complicated and nuanced and easily subject to misinterpretation,” Leibowitz said.

Of the applications that were accepted, 42 exclusion requests were granted and 56 denied. The 42 that were granted cover seven different companies importing steel products from Japan, Sweden, Belgium, Germany and China. The seven companies receiving the exclusions include:  Schick Manufacturing, Inc.; Nachi America, Inc.; Hankev International; Zapp Precision Wire; U.S. Leakless; Woodings Industrial Corp.; and PolyVision Corp.

Fifty-two of the 56 requests that were denied came from the following 11 companies: Material Sciences; Mill Products, Inc.; North American Fastener; Primrose Alloys; Scott Way; Seneca Foods; Wright McGill; Arrow Gear Co.; Bekaert; Midas International Group; and Stainless Imports, Inc. (The other four companies are unknown to Steel Market Update.)

“Of the companies that received approvals, the tonnages appear very small. The approvals are for just one year,” Leibowitz added. 

Tim Triplett

Read more from Tim Triplett

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel

Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.

US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations

US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.

Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election

Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?