Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/938d6a8ad2a1d2a8839bc3ece17d4fba.jpg)
Leibowitz on Trade: Section 232 on Autos, Circumvention by Korea and Taiwan
Written by Tim Triplett
June 14, 2018
Lewis Leibowitz, trade attorney and contributor to Steel Market Update, offers the following commentary on the latest trade developments in Washington:
• The Section 232 investigation into automobiles and auto parts is in the comment phase. The deadline for written comments is June 22. The hearing in the investigation is on July 19 and 20. If the steel and aluminum cases are any guide, there is a very good chance that the result is precooked. Thus, comments should work on establishing the true national security issues relating to automobiles. It could be that only Congress and the courts can prevent serious damage to the U.S. economy. The U.S. auto industry includes both traditional U.S. companies and U.S. affiliates of foreign companies. Please keep June 22 on your calendar if your business relates at all to automotive production.
• Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross will testify before the Senate Finance Committee on June 20. The Chairman of the Committee, Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), has vocally criticized the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum and called the Section 232 investigation into autos and auto parts “deeply misguided.” In a related development, Sen. Bob Corker’s amendment requiring congressional approval of Section 232 tariffs could not get a vote on the Senate floor in connection with the Defense Authorization Act. The White House urged senators not to support the Corker amendment because it would “undercut” the president’s “negotiating leverage.” I would feel better about that point if someone was negotiating with the president. The mission now seems to be breaking the international trading system. The hearing should be interesting because it will provide a platform for expressing frustration with the administration’s trade policy. I do not expect any new initiatives or announcements from Secretary Ross, although he is likely to be asked about product exclusions under the steel and aluminum tariffs.
• On Tuesday, the nominee for Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Jeffrey Kessler, had a confirmation hearing before the Senate Finance Committee. Enforcement and Compliance is the Commerce office responsible for administering antidumping and countervailing duty cases. E&C has added people to the daunting task of handling product exclusions under the steel and aluminum tariffs, but plays a supporting role to the Bureau of Industry and Security. Mr. Kessler agreed with ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) that exclusion requesters had a right to “due process,” but there did not seem to be agreement between Sen. Wyden and Kessler about what that means. In particular, Sen. Wyden complained about requests where objections had been filed against requests and the requesters had no opportunity to rebut the claims in the objection. Thus far, this is a legitimate concern. In a number of cases involving semifinished steel (slabs, billets, etc.), objections asserted without factual support that semifinished steel was available domestically. There is little evidence to support this assertion. Domestic producers claim that they would supply slabs and other semifinished products if the prices were higher, but there is little evidence of that desire, either. The new assistant secretary, if confirmed, is not likely to be of significant assistance in gaining more due process in exclusion cases. We will have to wait and see when the results start coming in.
• As reported last month, the Commerce Department determined that imports of cold rolled and corrosion resistant (CORE) steel from Vietnam were circumventing the orders on cold rolled and CORE steel from China. Imports from Vietnam are now treated as Chinese, so long as the hot rolled or cold rolled came from China. This circumvention finding vastly extends the reach of antidumping and countervailing duty orders. On Tuesday, as expected, domestic steel producers filed petitions alleging circumvention of cold rolled and CORE steel orders on Korea and CORE on Taiwan, alleging that these products from Vietnam are circumventing the orders on Korea and Taiwan if they use substrate (hot rolled or cold rolled steel) from those countries. The precedent set under the Chinese orders, if followed, will allow orders on a few countries to be expanded indefinitely. The concept is dangerous to steel traders, importers and users in the United States. The Commerce Department’s determination in the China cases will certainly be challenged in the WTO, and the U.S. could well lose. A lot of damage will ensue before those decisions can be implemented, however.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
www.lellawoffice.com
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/tim-triplett.jpeg)
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/galvanized_coil.png)
Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel
Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/investigate.png)
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant steel.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations
US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/cbd2ad03f626e665deb71b2742b25bbb.jpg)
Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election
Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US senators urge reduction to S. Korean OCTG quota
https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-casey-fetterman-biden-administration-level-playing-field-american-octg-industry