Trade Cases
Line Pipe Producers Refute Challenges to Section 232 Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
June 12, 2018
Speaking in support of the Section 232 tariffs, the American Line Pipe Producers Association is challenging recent claims by U.S. pipeline developers that they are unable to source sufficient quantities of large-diameter line pipe in the United States.
The large-diameter welded pipe industry in the U.S. is operating at its lowest capacity in years—well under 40 percent—and, if given the opportunity, is “ready, able and eager” to supply pipeline operators, says ALPPA.
“U.S. producers can make virtually everything demanded for American pipeline projects, and they do so using domestic steel,” said Tim Brightbill, trade counsel to ALPPA. “Complaints by industry groups such as the Interstate National Gas Association of America (INGAA) and the Association of Oil Pipe Lines (AOPL) are completely unfounded. There is no reason why U.S. pipeline projects should not be using U.S.-manufactured large-diameter line pipe.”
A second allegation ALPPA refutes is that pipeline projects will be put on hold due to the high cost of Section 232 tariffs. Pipeline costs have been exaggerated, said ALPPA. Although tariffs may increase the price of imported pipe, large-diameter welded pipe accounts for only 20 percent of the total pipeline project cost, and pipeline projects continue to be highly profitable.
ALPPA notes that pipeline operators continue to rely on imports despite the tariffs, resulting in lost bids for domestic producers and further injury from “dumped and subsidized imports” of large-diameter pipe.
The Trump administration is correct in concluding that imports of steel pipe threaten U.S. national security and critical infrastructure, says ALLPA, pointing to affirmative preliminary determinations by the U.S. International Trade Commission in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on pipe imports from Canada, China, Greece, India, Korea and Turkey.
“ALPPA strongly opposes requests from pipeline operators to be excluded from the steel Section 232 tariffs,” said the association.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.