Trade Cases
Canada Trade Inequity: Fact or Hype?
Written by Sandy Williams
June 11, 2018
Is Canada really guilty of the trade inequity that President Trump charges? We looked at two product targets of the administration—dairy and automobiles—to find out.
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative estimates trade with Canada in 2017 totaled $673.9 billion–$341.2 billion in exports and $332.8 billion in imports, for a goods and services trade surplus for the U.S. of $8.4 billion.
The services part of that equation is what creates the surplus. Exports of services from the U.S., like travel, computer software and management services, totaled an estimated $58.7 billion in 2017, approaching double that of services imported from Canada at $32.8 billion. Removing services from the equation, the U.S had a trade deficit of $17.5 billion with Canada, according to Commerce data.
Trump wrote on Twitter, after leaving the G7 summit, that steel and aluminum tariffs were in response to a 270 percent tariff by Canada on dairy products. Notwithstanding the fact that Section 232 tariffs are supposedly predicated on national security threats, not milk, Canada does indeed have a high tariff to protect its dairy industry, which kicks in once U.S. imports exceed 10 percent of the Canadian market.
In the latest figures from 2016, however, the U.S. exported five times as much dairy to Canada as it imported. Despite paying higher prices, last year Canada bought $792 million worth of dairy products from the U.S. while exporting only $149 million to the U.S., according to data from the U.S. Dairy Export Council and the Canadian government.
The U.S. dairy industry hoped to take a larger part of the Canadian market through the NAFTA agreement, but was stymied by Canada’s “supply management program” that controls dairy supply and prices. Neighboring Wisconsin produces more dairy products than all of Canada and was a strong supporter of Trump. California, another sizable dairy region, exports about 12 percent of its products across the northern border.
When Canada included an ultra-filtered milk product under its supply management rules last year, the U.S. industry lost millions and exports of the product from Canada tripled. The dairy industry was a fervent lobbyist for a renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement and Trump was willing to oblige his political constituency.
Now Trump is promoting a Section 232 tariff on automobiles and parts in response to Canada’s “massive tariffs” and “flooding” of the U.S. market with Canadian built vehicles. The USITC estimates vehicle imports from Canada to the U.S. totaled $56 billion in 2017.
“Autos [and related parts] represent just under 20 percent of our goods exports to the U.S. The products covered under the steel and aluminum tariffs are only about 4 percent,” said Royce Mendes, senior economist at CIBC World Markets in comments to CBC/Radio Canada.
“However, the U.S. administration should tread carefully. A major portion of the automotive products we ship south are made up of U.S. parts.”

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.