Trade Cases
Canada Trade Inequity: Fact or Hype?
Written by Sandy Williams
June 11, 2018
Is Canada really guilty of the trade inequity that President Trump charges? We looked at two product targets of the administration—dairy and automobiles—to find out.
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative estimates trade with Canada in 2017 totaled $673.9 billion–$341.2 billion in exports and $332.8 billion in imports, for a goods and services trade surplus for the U.S. of $8.4 billion.
The services part of that equation is what creates the surplus. Exports of services from the U.S., like travel, computer software and management services, totaled an estimated $58.7 billion in 2017, approaching double that of services imported from Canada at $32.8 billion. Removing services from the equation, the U.S had a trade deficit of $17.5 billion with Canada, according to Commerce data.
Trump wrote on Twitter, after leaving the G7 summit, that steel and aluminum tariffs were in response to a 270 percent tariff by Canada on dairy products. Notwithstanding the fact that Section 232 tariffs are supposedly predicated on national security threats, not milk, Canada does indeed have a high tariff to protect its dairy industry, which kicks in once U.S. imports exceed 10 percent of the Canadian market.
In the latest figures from 2016, however, the U.S. exported five times as much dairy to Canada as it imported. Despite paying higher prices, last year Canada bought $792 million worth of dairy products from the U.S. while exporting only $149 million to the U.S., according to data from the U.S. Dairy Export Council and the Canadian government.
The U.S. dairy industry hoped to take a larger part of the Canadian market through the NAFTA agreement, but was stymied by Canada’s “supply management program” that controls dairy supply and prices. Neighboring Wisconsin produces more dairy products than all of Canada and was a strong supporter of Trump. California, another sizable dairy region, exports about 12 percent of its products across the northern border.
When Canada included an ultra-filtered milk product under its supply management rules last year, the U.S. industry lost millions and exports of the product from Canada tripled. The dairy industry was a fervent lobbyist for a renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement and Trump was willing to oblige his political constituency.
Now Trump is promoting a Section 232 tariff on automobiles and parts in response to Canada’s “massive tariffs” and “flooding” of the U.S. market with Canadian built vehicles. The USITC estimates vehicle imports from Canada to the U.S. totaled $56 billion in 2017.
“Autos [and related parts] represent just under 20 percent of our goods exports to the U.S. The products covered under the steel and aluminum tariffs are only about 4 percent,” said Royce Mendes, senior economist at CIBC World Markets in comments to CBC/Radio Canada.
“However, the U.S. administration should tread carefully. A major portion of the automotive products we ship south are made up of U.S. parts.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b83/11b839fc6967d9cfa28d1af34341b98320ce962c" alt=""
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bef95/bef9521b0f9e881d0568a3fe3d45a242dc1ecb8c" alt=""
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.