Trade Cases
Canada Trade Inequity: Fact or Hype?
Written by Sandy Williams
June 11, 2018
Is Canada really guilty of the trade inequity that President Trump charges? We looked at two product targets of the administration—dairy and automobiles—to find out.
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative estimates trade with Canada in 2017 totaled $673.9 billion–$341.2 billion in exports and $332.8 billion in imports, for a goods and services trade surplus for the U.S. of $8.4 billion.
The services part of that equation is what creates the surplus. Exports of services from the U.S., like travel, computer software and management services, totaled an estimated $58.7 billion in 2017, approaching double that of services imported from Canada at $32.8 billion. Removing services from the equation, the U.S had a trade deficit of $17.5 billion with Canada, according to Commerce data.
Trump wrote on Twitter, after leaving the G7 summit, that steel and aluminum tariffs were in response to a 270 percent tariff by Canada on dairy products. Notwithstanding the fact that Section 232 tariffs are supposedly predicated on national security threats, not milk, Canada does indeed have a high tariff to protect its dairy industry, which kicks in once U.S. imports exceed 10 percent of the Canadian market.
In the latest figures from 2016, however, the U.S. exported five times as much dairy to Canada as it imported. Despite paying higher prices, last year Canada bought $792 million worth of dairy products from the U.S. while exporting only $149 million to the U.S., according to data from the U.S. Dairy Export Council and the Canadian government.
The U.S. dairy industry hoped to take a larger part of the Canadian market through the NAFTA agreement, but was stymied by Canada’s “supply management program” that controls dairy supply and prices. Neighboring Wisconsin produces more dairy products than all of Canada and was a strong supporter of Trump. California, another sizable dairy region, exports about 12 percent of its products across the northern border.
When Canada included an ultra-filtered milk product under its supply management rules last year, the U.S. industry lost millions and exports of the product from Canada tripled. The dairy industry was a fervent lobbyist for a renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement and Trump was willing to oblige his political constituency.
Now Trump is promoting a Section 232 tariff on automobiles and parts in response to Canada’s “massive tariffs” and “flooding” of the U.S. market with Canadian built vehicles. The USITC estimates vehicle imports from Canada to the U.S. totaled $56 billion in 2017.
“Autos [and related parts] represent just under 20 percent of our goods exports to the U.S. The products covered under the steel and aluminum tariffs are only about 4 percent,” said Royce Mendes, senior economist at CIBC World Markets in comments to CBC/Radio Canada.
“However, the U.S. administration should tread carefully. A major portion of the automotive products we ship south are made up of U.S. parts.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Nippon respects HR dumping decision, expects lower rate in next review
Nippon Steel says it respects the US Department of Commerce’s findings in administrative reviews despite the agency recently assigning the Japanese steelmaker a higher dumping margin.
CRU: Trump tariffs could stimulate steel demand
Now that the dust has settled from the US election, as have the immediate reactions in the equity, bond, and commodity markets, this is a prime opportunity to look at how a second Trump presidency might affect the US steel market.
Rebar import duties to continue for 5 more years
Import duties on rebar from a handful of countries will continue to be collected for at least another five years.
Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies
China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.
Commerce says Nippon dumped steel in US in 2022-23
Commerce determined a significant dumping margin for hot-rolled steel imports from Japan's Nippon Steel.