Trade Cases
Canada Initiates AD/CVD Investigation into Cold Roll Imports
Written by Sandy Williams
May 29, 2018
The Canada Border Services Agency initiated an investigation on May 25 into the dumping and subsidizing of certain cold-rolled steels in coils or cut lengths from China, South Korea, and Vietnam.
The investigation was prompted by a complaint from ArcelorMittal Dofasco. Cold rolled imports under the investigation increased from 85,075 metric tons in 2015 to 133,440 tons in 2016, and 146,116 tons in 2017. ArcelorMittal states that the subject imports captured over one-third of the Canadian market in only three years by undercutting domestic pricing and depressing margins.
The problem has been compounded by excess capacity in the steel and cold rolled sectors, especially in China, and weak market demand in China, Korea and Vietnam. Exports of CRS are expected to increase from China and Korea in 2018 and 2019. Vietnam is increasing capacity with two mills that were expected to come on line last year.
In its complaint ArcelorMittal Dofasco stated: “The imposition by the United States of tariffs on Chinese and Vietnamese CRS as a result of the section 232 investigation, and the agreement by Korea to reduce steel shipments to the United States by 30 percent, has created an incendiary situation, threatening to exacerbate the turmoil in global steel markets and divert increasing volumes of CRS to the Canadian market.”
A safeguard inquiry regarding CRS initiated by the European Commission in late March 2018 is expected to worsen the problem for Canada.
“These circumstances pose an unprecedented threat of injury to the Canadian domestic industry,” added Dofasco.
The complaint was supported by letters from Algoma and Stelco, who with ArcelorMittal Dofasco represent 100 percent of the Canadian production of cold rolled steel.
A statement of reasons regarding the initiation of the investigation will be released on June 8. Importer responses to CBSA are due by June 18 and exporter and government responses by July 3.
A preliminary determination will be made by Aug. 23 with reasons to follow by September. If an affirmative determination is made by CBSA, the following schedule for the investigation will be implemented.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.