Trade Cases
Commerce Applies Duties on Vietnamese Steel Linked to China
Written by Tim Triplett
May 22, 2018
Marking a win for U.S. steelmakers, the Commerce Department on Monday officially slapped duties on corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) and certain cold rolled steel products imported from Vietnam that were produced from substrate originating in China. Commerce determined that even though the products underwent some processing in Vietnam, they should still be subject to the same antidumping and countervailing duty orders as if they had been exported directly from China.
Domestic steelmakers who filed the case argued China was seeking to circumvent U.S. duties by shipping steel through a third country, in this case Vietnam. Shipments of CORE from Vietnam to the United States increased from $2 million to $80 million after preliminary duties were imposed on Chinese products in 2015. Likewise, shipments of cold-rolled steel from Vietnam to the United States increased from $9 million to $215 million.
U.S. law provides that Commerce may find circumvention of AD/CVD orders when merchandise that is the same class or kind as merchandise subject to existing orders is completed or assembled in a third country prior to importation into the United States.
Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits on imports of CORE produced in Vietnam using Chinese-origin substrate at antidumping rates of 199.43 percent and countervailing duty rates of 39.05 percent. CBP will also collect cash deposits on imports of cold-rolled steel produced in Vietnam using Chinese-origin substrate at antidumping rates of 199.76 percent and countervailing duty rates of 256.44 percent. These cash deposit rates were previously established in the AD and CVD investigations on cold-rolled steel and CORE from China. Cash deposits will apply to all unliquidated entries on or after Nov. 4, 2016, the date the inquiries were initiated, Commerce said.
Importers and exporters of Vietnamese merchandise that is produced from substrate originating in Vietnam or a third-country have the option of seeking an exemption from cash deposits by certifying that the substrate originated outside of China.
The trade case was originally filed by domestic producers Steel Dynamics, Inc., California Steel Industries, AK Steel Corp., ArcelorMittal USA, Nucor Corp. and United States Steel Corp.
The duties on CORE and cold rolled from Vietnam come in addition to a 25 percent tariff resulting from the Trump administration’s Section 232 national security investigation.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.