Trade Cases
Manufacturers Form New Coalition to Oppose Tariffs
Written by Tim Triplett
April 19, 2018
U.S. manufacturing groups claiming to represent more than 30,000 users of steel and aluminum announced a new coalition Wednesday to oppose the Trump administration’s Section 232 tariffs.
The Coalition of American Metal Manufacturers and Users includes the Industrial Fasteners Institute, the National Tooling & Machining Association, the North American Association of Food Equipment Manufacturers, the Precision Machined Parts Association, the Precision Metalforming Association and the American Wire Producer Association.
The industry groups and their supporters dispute the Commerce Department’s determination that trade restrictions were needed to enable U.S. steel producers to operate at a profitable capacity utilization. “This central claim that tariffs will enable producers to operate at an 80 percent or better capacity utilization rate is at the heart of the rationale for these steel tariffs,” said supporter Richard Chriss, president of the American Institute for International Steel, at an April 18 press conference. “And this rationale is explicitly stated in official government reports. Yet despite its critical importance to this debate, this assertion has been little noted in our public policy discussions and has not been thoroughly and critically evaluated until now.”
Chriss pointed to a new report produced by consultants at Martin Associates that contends there is no correlation between steel imports and steel capacity utilization. The report concludes that the imposition of steep tariffs on imports will not bolster capacity utilization.
The Commerce Department reportedly has dismissed the findings of the April 18 report stating, “it was paid for by a consortium of foreign steel companies and importers, and so it is not surprising that it supports their interests,” reported Inside U.S. Trade.
AIIS hopes the administration will “see the new facts” in the report and reconsider the tariffs, Chriss said.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.