Trade Cases
Administration Plans More Tariffs Even as Chinese Retaliate Over 232
Written by Tim Triplett
April 3, 2018
Tensions between Washington and Beijing over China’s policies toward U.S. and foreign investment and the multibillion-dollar trade surplus with the United States continued to escalate this week. In retaliation for the Trump administration’s tariffs of 25 percent on steel and 10 percent on aluminum, which took effect March 23, China has imposed tariffs on up to $3 billion in U.S. exports, mostly agricultural products, effective Monday, April 2.
For about 120 items, concessions made earlier by the Chinese have been withdrawn, resulting in a 15 percent tariff on certain U.S. exports, including fresh fruits, dried fruits and nut products, wines, modified ethanol and seamless steel pipes. For eight other items, including aluminum scrap and frozen pork and related products, the retaliatory tariff amounts to 25 percent, reports Washington trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz.
Under pressure from its allies, the Trump administration granted temporary exclusions from the Section 232 tariffs to Canada, Mexico, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea and the EU countries until May 1 while trade negotiations continue. China, on the other hand, remains the main target of U.S. trade action.
Apparently undeterred by China’s reaction to the Section 232 tariffs, the U.S. Trade Representative this week is expected to recommend additional tariffs on $50 billion or more of Chinese imports as a result of the USTR’s investigation into China’s allegedly unfair intellectual property practices.
A statement from China’s Ministry of Finance claims that the U.S. tariffs violate the WTO agreement and have severely undermined China’s position. Suspending the tariff concessions on U.S. imports, the ministry said, is a justified move to safeguard China’s interests, using WTO rules.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.