Trade Cases
South Korea Concedes, Avoids Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
March 27, 2018
The U.S. and South Korea have reached an agreement on amendments to the KORUS agreement. In return for exemption from Section 232 tariffs, Korea will reduce its steel exports to the U.S. by 30 percent to 2.68 million tons annually.
In addition, Korea agreed to increase automotive imports from the U.S. to 50,000 vehicles per U.S. manufacturer from the 25,000 vehicles currently permitted. The imports will meet U.S. safety standards, and not necessarily Korea’s stricter environmental and safety standards.
Another change may quash plans by Korean auto manufacturer Hyundai to introduce a truck model in the U.S. South Korea has agreed to a 20-year extension of the phase out of a 25 percent tariff on trucks. Under the existing agreement, the tariff would have ended in three years; the new agreement will extend the termination of the tariff until 2041.
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said the strategy of using the tariffs as leverage in the negotiations worked, calling it an “absolute win-win.”
South Korea remained firm on its agricultural tariffs. Korea’s trade minister Kim Hyun-chong stressed during a press conference that “there will be no further opening of agricultural markets and no changes to the tariffs that had already been lifted.”
The deal was viewed as the best that South Korea could hope for, but more trade pressure is likely from the Trump administration.
“If President Trump becomes a two-term president … I believe there will be continuous (trade) risks during that time,” Trade Minister Kim said.
“This leaves a bad precedent of exchanging steel tariffs – which is a breach of international trade law – for a legitimate free trade agreement, in negotiations,” said Wonmog Choi, professor of law at Ewha Womans University, in a comment to Reuters.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.