Trade Cases

WTO in Uproar Over Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
March 24, 2018
More than 40 members of the World Trade Organization took the floor at a meeting of the Council on Trade in Goods on Friday to voice their concerns over U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Members warned that the measures would have repercussions “not only on traders’ commercial interests but also on the predictability and stability of the rules-based multilateral trading system.”
China argued that the U.S. tariffs ignored information demonstrating that steel and aluminum imports do not affect national security.
Russia said the new tariffs exceed the rates the U.S. had committed to under the WTO agreement and sought clarification on how exempting some WTO members from the tariffs and not others could be justified under WTO rules.
The U.S. responded that the quantities of imports and circumstances of global excess capacity for producing steel and aluminum “threaten to impair the national security” and that tariffs were necessary to address the situation. The U.S. added that relief from duties was authorized for steel and aluminum products that are not produced in sufficient quantity or quality in the United States. The WTO members that were exempted temporarily from tariffs were those with which the U.S. has a “security relationship,” said the U.S. official.
Director-General Roberto Azevedo issued the following statement: “At today’s meeting of the Council on Trade in Goods, WTO members reviewed and discussed many of the most pressing trade issues of the moment, including a number of the specific tensions that have arisen between different members in recent weeks. It is positive to see members continuing to use the WTO as a place to discuss these issues.
“I encourage members to continue working through the WTO’s many forums and mechanisms to deal with their concerns and explore potential solutions. Actions taken outside these collective processes greatly increase the risk of escalation in a confrontation that will have no winners, and which could quickly lead to a less stable trading system. Disrupting trade flows will jeopardize the global economy at a time when economic recovery, though fragile, has been increasingly evident around the world. I again call for restraint and urgent dialogue as the best path forward to resolve these problems.”

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.