Trade Cases

WTO in Uproar Over Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
March 24, 2018
More than 40 members of the World Trade Organization took the floor at a meeting of the Council on Trade in Goods on Friday to voice their concerns over U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Members warned that the measures would have repercussions “not only on traders’ commercial interests but also on the predictability and stability of the rules-based multilateral trading system.”
China argued that the U.S. tariffs ignored information demonstrating that steel and aluminum imports do not affect national security.
Russia said the new tariffs exceed the rates the U.S. had committed to under the WTO agreement and sought clarification on how exempting some WTO members from the tariffs and not others could be justified under WTO rules.
The U.S. responded that the quantities of imports and circumstances of global excess capacity for producing steel and aluminum “threaten to impair the national security” and that tariffs were necessary to address the situation. The U.S. added that relief from duties was authorized for steel and aluminum products that are not produced in sufficient quantity or quality in the United States. The WTO members that were exempted temporarily from tariffs were those with which the U.S. has a “security relationship,” said the U.S. official.
Director-General Roberto Azevedo issued the following statement: “At today’s meeting of the Council on Trade in Goods, WTO members reviewed and discussed many of the most pressing trade issues of the moment, including a number of the specific tensions that have arisen between different members in recent weeks. It is positive to see members continuing to use the WTO as a place to discuss these issues.
“I encourage members to continue working through the WTO’s many forums and mechanisms to deal with their concerns and explore potential solutions. Actions taken outside these collective processes greatly increase the risk of escalation in a confrontation that will have no winners, and which could quickly lead to a less stable trading system. Disrupting trade flows will jeopardize the global economy at a time when economic recovery, though fragile, has been increasingly evident around the world. I again call for restraint and urgent dialogue as the best path forward to resolve these problems.”

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.

Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.

Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.

Global steel forum sets 2026 framework deadline as US ups pressure on excess capacity
Global steelmakers sounded the alarm Friday over the deepening excess steelmaking capacity crisis. Ministers at the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) in Gqeberha, South Africa, pledged to...

CRU: China’s indirect steel exports find new destination markets
The boom in China’s direct steel exports has not stopped this year, even with a rise in protectionist measures globally. The increase is driven by...