Trade Cases

Trump Backtracks on 232, Exempts More Countries
Written by Sandy Williams
March 22, 2018
With the announcement that seven countries will be exempt from the steel tariffs that take effect tomorrow, less than one-third of U.S. steel imports will be subject to the tariffs, by some estimates. U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said during a Senate Finance Committee hearing today that the President has decided “to pause the imposition of tariffs with respect to [the following] countries:” Canada, Mexico, the European Union, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, and South Korea.
Korea is the third largest importer of steel into the United States and an important ally in negotiating with North Korea. Korean media is reporting that the government offered concessions to the U.S. on automotive imports and exports in return for the tariff exemption. Reportedly, the U.S. will delay lowering a 25 percent tariff on Korean trucks that was to go into effect next year. In addition, Korea will consider easing controversial safety and environmental standards for U.S. auto imports.
Korean news source Chosunilbo reported, “At present, the U.S. can export up to 25,000 cars to Korea that meet only American safety guidelines, but the U.S. wants Korea to increase that quota. Cars accounted for 62 percent of the U.S. trade deficit with Korea last year, largely because nobody here is interested in the clumsily designed gas-guzzling cars American firms make.”
The European Union has been aggressively lobbying for exemption in the past few weeks. The EU trade commissioner vowed the region would “stand up to the bullies” over protectionism. The EU published a list of U.S. products on which it intended to impose retaliatory measures if the U.S. proceeded with its tariffs. The list included bourbon, rice, orange juice, clothing, shoes and Harley-Davidson motorcycles totaling to more than $3.5 billion in U.S. imports–and targeting goods from Trump’s voting base.
Brazil, the second largest exporter of steel products to the U.S., will have an exemption while it continues discussions to negotiate a permanent exclusion. “The new tariffs, says the White House message, will not apply as long as we are talking about the issue. Good news,” said Brazilian President Michel Temer following the announcement. In the meantime, Brazil will continue to pay the current tariffs of 0.9 percent for steel and 2 percent for aluminum.
Argentina exemptions will also be on hold during discussions. Argentine Commerce Secretary Miguel Braun told the Buenos Aires Times that the U.S. government was leaning toward looking at the issue on a case-by-case basis, rather than by country.
Australian trade minister Steve Ciobo said that being a good military partner to the U.S. and having a trade deficit with America was instrumental in convincing President Trump not to impose tariffs on Australian steel and aluminum. Australian analysts wondered what kind of quid pro quo the “pat on the head’ by the U.S. administration might lead to in the future.
Turkey is among the nations that are still not exempt. Steel producers in Turkey were counting on the tariff to be applied equally. “There should be no import tariff, of course,” said Namik Ekinici, Chairman of the Turkish Steel Exporters Association (CIB). “But if there must be an import tariff, then the right thing to do is to apply it equally to all countries.” Ekinici said the tariff would cause U.S. steel prices to rise, thus Turkish steel would remain competitive and not be seriously affected. Whether his assessment will now hold true remains to be seen.
House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) is urging the administration to set a “sunset” date for the tariffs and to implement them for “the absolute minimum period.”
“Their effectiveness should be constantly studied. They should be sunset after one year. If they are not having the intended effect, we should assess whether another policy would be more effective instead of continuing them,” said Brady.
The tariffs are to go into effect March 23.

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases

Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.

Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.

Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.

Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.

ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.