Trade Cases
Appeals for Tariff Exclusions Already in the Works
Written by Tim Triplett
March 15, 2018
Companies that import steel products can apply for relief from President Trump’s tariff immediately, even before the Commerce Department issues formal procedures, recommends Washington trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz. “I see no reason to wait for detailed procedures to come out from Commerce. A letter to the Secretary should suffice to get started,” he said.
The Commerce Department is working on procedures for parties to apply for exclusion from the 25 percent tariff on steel imports signed by President Trump on March 8. The procedures are to be issued by March 18, 10 days from the president’s proclamation. The tariffs are scheduled to become effective on March 23.
The proclamation on steel sets out the following criteria for product exclusions: “[The Commerce Secretary] is hereby authorized to provide relief from the additional duties set forth in … this proclamation for any steel article determined not to be produced in the United States in a sufficient and reasonably available amount or of a satisfactory quality and is also authorized to provide such relief based upon specific national security considerations. Such relief shall be provided for a steel article only after a request for exclusion is made by a directly affected party located in the United States.”
There is some precedent for tariff exclusions. In the safeguard tariff regime of 2002-03, exclusions were granted on more than 400 products, Leibowitz said. Generally, duties were refunded retroactively after the exclusions were approved. “We don’t know if that will be repeated this time. The situation is very muddled.”
Parties seeking relief should base their claims on the key words in the proclamation: products not sufficiently available or of satisfactory quality in the U.S. Note that price is not mentioned as a criterion, Leibowitz said.
There are reports that companies and countries are already negotiating to be excluded from the tariffs, but no real sign of movement yet. Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, an opponent of Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum, reportedly has introduced legislation to nullify them, though the bill’s text is not available, Leibowitz added.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.