Trade Cases
SMU Market Trends: Does the Steel Industry Still Need Section 232?
Written by Tim Triplett
December 21, 2017
With demand fairly strong and prices rising, two out of three respondents to this week’s Steel Market Update market trends questionnaire feel there is no longer any need for President Trump to act on Section 232 ahead of the mid-January deadline.
Earlier this year, the Trump administration instructed the Commerce Department to investigate whether low-priced steel imports pose a threat to the U.S. steel industry, and thus to national security, under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The administration originally planned to impose new Section 232 tariffs or quotas on steel imports in June, but then delayed action in the face of strong opposition and has left the market hanging for months. Commerce and the president have a matter of weeks to act on the controversial measure, unless they choose to let it lapse. Following are some of the more insightful comments from steel buyers this week:
Some still favor Section 232:
- “Section 232 is needed for a few select countries and products.” Service Center/Wholesaler
- “Yes, but it needs to be reasonable. Exclude all .016 and lighter HDG that the domestic mills don’t want to make anyway.” Service Center/Wholesaler
Many don’t now, nor ever did, support Section 232:
- “Section 232 would totally disrupt the market. Nothing worse could happen.” Trading Company
- “The president was never justified to act on Section 232. Such drastic protectionist measures are not good for global trade. If he acts on it, he will likely exempt half the countries.” Manufacturer/OEM
- “We never did need Section 232. Please correct me if I am wrong, but why are our domestic prices higher than the rest of the world? Then the domestic mills want even higher pricing. Soon everybody will make finished goods offshore. Then none of us will have the problem anymore because there will be no business.” Service Center/Wholesaler
- “When the Defense Department turned against Section 232, it was the strongest signal yet that it’s not needed.” Steel Mill
- Section 232 will happen, but I expect it to be watered down. Watch for a surge of Vietnamese material in the interim as the preliminary decision on circumvention empowers the trading community.” Trading Company
One observation from a service center executive that all can agree on: “The president needs to act to create visibility and allow businesses to plan for their year. Conclude it one way or the other.”
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Supply chains, end-users brace for impact from tariffs
Supply chains are working through what the tariffs mean for them
Breaking News: Commerce releases prelim anti-dumping duties in sweeping trade case targeting CORE imports
The US Commerce Department on Friday released preliminary anti-dumping margins in a trade case targeted imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. Certain countries and mills were hammered while others were largely spared. Brazilian steelmaker CSN, for example, received a preliminary rate of 137.76%. Some Turkish mills – including Boreclik and ArcelorMittal Celik Ticaret – received no dumping margin at all.
CRU: Trump’s sweeping tariffs could derail the US met coal industry
Latest tariffs could lead to US metallurgical coal exporters (many already high-cost swing producers) being priced out of the market.
Tariff fallout: Canada strikes back, Stellantis idles, GM boosts production
Canada imposes auto tariffs, while automaker Stellantis temporarily idles some plants.
Commerce tags UAE with ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case, South Africa spared
The Commerce Department has made a preliminary determination that ‘critical circumstances’ exist for certain imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) flat-rolled steel from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Commerce decided that critical circumstances did not apply to CORE from South Africa. The department also found that critical circumstances did not apply to CORE from UAE producers Al-Ghurair Iron & Steel LLC and United Iron & Steel Company LLC.