Trade Cases
AIIS: Terminate Section 232
Written by Sandy Williams
October 4, 2017
The American Institute for International Steel, representing 120 companies supporting 1.2 million jobs in the steel-using sectors and 84,000 direct and indirect jobs in the marine transportation system, wrote to the president this week requesting termination of the Section 232 investigation on steel imports.
AIIS said they appreciate that a significant part of the rationale for the investigation is to address steel market distortions caused by global overcapacity. However, trade restrictions imposed by Section 232 will do nothing to counter the use of state subsidies by countries, such as China, which encourage overcapacity.
The United States steel industry is currently profitable and one of the most protected sectors in the country, said AIIS. The majority of antidumping and countervailing rulings listed by Commerce concern the steel industry.
Retaliation by the nation’s trading partners, particularly on the agriculture sector, is likely should the United States impose Section 232 restrictions on steel imports, they said.
“Mr. President, as you know, trade retaliation is always a ‘lose-lose’ proposition,” wrote AIIS. The association cited the trade dispute in 2009 when China retaliated with tariffs on U.S. chicken exports in response to duties placed on imported Chinese tires.
Although the United States may eventually prevail in a trade dispute over steel imports, said AIIS, the legal battle may take years and cost millions of dollars while irretrievably losing market share for the U.S.
Trade restrictions bring unintended consequences to the supply chain. Ocean vessels carrying inbound steel to the United States are also the vessels that carry U.S. grain exports overseas. With import restrictions in place on steel imports, fewer vessels will be available at U.S. ports to transport grain, putting 50,000 American jobs at risk.
AIIS told President Trump that while they absolutely support a strong steel industry, it is the entire steel supply chain that makes America great.
“Let us not attempt to further protect the few at the expense of the many. Let us terminate the Section 232 investigation now, and keep our country’s ports, and the many Americans whose livelihoods depend on them, working.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on trade: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.