Trade Cases
Steel Forum Moving Toward Report on Excess Capacity
Written by Sandy Williams
September 12, 2017
G-20 members are on track to hold their first official meeting of the Global Steel Forum on Excess Steel Capacity this fall. The forum was formed last year during the 2016 meetings to find “collective solutions” to remedy steel overcapacity and discourage protectionism. The group met informally at the Summit in Hamburg in July 2017.
Members have been meeting at the working-group level compiling information for a comprehensive report on overcapacity, reported Inside U.S. Trade. At the Hamburg G-20 meeting, the forum was instructed to meet “commitments on enhancing information sharing and cooperation” by August and produce a “substantive” report with “concrete policy solutions” by November.
“Almost all the Global Forum members are now providing complete plant-level data on steel plants and relevant information on government policies and measures,” an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development official told Inside U.S. Trade.
China and India, two of the largest contributors to excess capacity, have shown signs of “increasing agreement” on the issue, and members are optimistic that firm steps to address steel overcapacity will be offered in the November report.
The forum will convene Sept. 25-27 in Paris to begin drafting the November report. According to a forum official, members will discuss information that has been shared and “current practices that may be influencing steel capacity and market developments. Members will look at effective steps to reduce excess capacity with a view to developing concrete policy solutions.”
Another working level meeting is expected to be scheduled for late October or early November and a formal ministerial meeting in late November or early December.
The forum’s mission is set against the timetable for a potential barring of steel imports into the U.S. in a Section 232 action by the Trump administration. The Commerce Department has until Jan. 14 to submit recommendations to the president.
The U.S. steel industry has urged the administration to move forward on its decision in order to relieve uncertainty in the global steel sector. Opponents of the Section 232 action urge multilateral discussions to solve overcapacity and to ensure fair and open markets.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on trade: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.