Trade Cases
Ross Tells Congress Section 232 Report Within a Week
Written by John Packard
July 14, 2017
U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) Secretary Wilbur Ross told the Senate Finance Committee today that the long-awaited Section 232 report on steel would be given to President Trump within a week. Ross told the Senators that the report would contain a “menu of options” on how to contain steel imports.
In an article published by World Trade Online earlier this evening, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) told reporters he sensed “they’re not yet there” on the report. He went on to say that the DOC should seek an “enduring solution,” and that in his view Section 232 is not the way to go.
Wyden told reporters that Ross “feels confident that his approach is going to make all sides happy in the steel industry,” but he added, “He has a big mountain to climb.”
The Washington Post reported, “Ross suggested different countries could be treated differently under any restrictions, and he singled out Canada, which he said had not dumped an oversupply of steel, unlike other countries,” according to a person in the meeting.
The Post continued: “Members of the Senate Finance Committee who emerged from a briefing with Secretary Ross Thursday afternoon said it is no longer a question of whether Trump acts to protect American steel, but how severely.”
There are many within the administration who are against the use of the Section 232 in order to curb imports of steel. There are many who feel there will be a negative reaction against U.S. products such as agriculture should steel be blocked from coming into the United States.
On Wednesday evening, President Trump, on Air Force One, told reporters of his intention to deal with the import crisis and that he had two options, “quotas” and “tariffs,” or maybe a combination of the two.
Once Ross provides his recommendations to President Trump, the president has 90 days to make his final determination. Will he wait until after the G20 steel committee meets in August?
Steel buyers have been waiting for the decision to come down and finally determine what the new rules of engagement will be for the domestic and foreign steel industries. They may not have too much longer to wait…
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.