Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e926/9e926b98fb1b1cdddaacfbf79976f0c5eb700e9b" alt=""
Ag Industry Against Section 232 Trade Restrictions
Written by Sandy Williams
July 13, 2017
The agriculture industry challenged the use of national security as a reason to limit steel and aluminum imports, in a missive to Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross on Monday. A letter from 18 agricultural associations urged the administration to consider the consequences trade barriers may have on the food industry.
“Many countries that export steel to the United States are also large importers of U.S. agriculture products. The potential for retaliation from these trading partners is very real,” said the associations.
The Section 232 national security argument under the 1994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Arcticle XXI is rarely used, and for good reason, said the association officials, who called it the “Pandora’s Box of the GATT.”
Since no one country can dictate the security needs of another, others may follow the United States’ example and find ways to circumvent trade commitments by invoking national security, argued the group.
U.S. farmers rely on international trade agreements to keep markets open. “Undermining that system through an extraordinarily loose application of national security exceptions would be a short-sighted mistake.”
The associations urged the Department of Commerce to avoid “igniting a trade war” through its use of Section 232.
The American Institute for International Steel forwarded to its members the agriculture association letter as another example of the large and growing unpopularity of the Section 232 initiative.
“It is now abundantly clear that it is the voice of the AIIS, as well as others, that continues to lead and to be heard on this issue within the administration, as evidenced by the somewhat surprising and unexpected delays in completing the investigation phase of this process,” wrote AIIS Chairman John Foster. “Our objective remains to stress that no new protectionist actions are needed for steel.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b83/11b839fc6967d9cfa28d1af34341b98320ce962c" alt=""
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.