Trade Cases

China Questions Legitimacy of EU Duties on Hot Rolled Steel

Written by Sandy Williams


China strongly condemned new antidumping and countervailing duties imposed Friday by the European Union on imports of hot-rolled flat steel from China. The EC applied definitive AD/CVD duties of up to 35.9 percent.

Commerce ministry official Wang Hejun said in a statement on Friday, “The European Commission ignores the fact that China’s steel exports to Europe clearly declined in 2016, using China’s steel overcapacity as an excuse to claim that China’s hot-rolled flat steel products threaten to damage industry in the EU when that is mere speculation with little bearing on reality.

“China strongly questions the legitimacy and legality of the European Commission’s ruling,” added Wang.

He argued that state-owned Chinese banks are independent market entities and that the EC continues to mistake bank loans as preferential lending. “It even disregarded basic financial facts by mistaking some bank loans directly as bestowal, inflating the subsidy range and seriously infringing the rights of Chinese companies,” he said.

Wang contended that not only does China not subsidize steel exports, it has taken steps to reduce them. “It is biased and unfair for Europe to blame China for its own industrial issues,” he said. “Unjustified accusations and reckless trade rescue measures will not help to solve the problem.”

EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstroem said the Commission is trying to “level the playing field” and protect European steelmakers from the flood of exports from China. “We are continuing to act, when necessary, against unfair trading conditions in the steel sector, and against foreign dumping,” Malmstroem said in a statement.

Latest in Trade Cases

Commerce tags UAE with ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case, South Africa spared

The Commerce Department has made a preliminary determination that ‘critical circumstances’ exist for certain imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) flat-rolled steel from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Commerce decided that critical circumstances did not apply to CORE from South Africa. The department also found that critical circumstances did not apply to CORE from UAE producers Al-Ghurair Iron & Steel LLC and United Iron & Steel Company LLC.