Trade Cases
Trump, Ross Support Section 232 Relief for Steel
Written by John Packard
June 8, 2017
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is leaning towards a Section 232 finding that national security is threatened by steel imports. On Thursday, he told a Senate Appropriations subcommittee that he believes there is “a genuine national security issue that must be considered in this case.”
Results of the Section 232 investigation are expected by the end of this month, but the administration seems to be moving even quicker toward a resolution. Ross’ comments, as well as comments by President Trump during his speech in Cincinnati on Wednesday, imply that an announcement benefiting the steel industry is forthcoming.
“Wait until you see what I am going to do for steel and your steel companies,” Trump said in his Ohio speech. “We are going to stop the dumping and stop all of these wonderful other countries from coming in and killing our companies and our workers. You will be seeing that very soon. The steel folks are going to be very happy.”
The private event held on the banks of the Ohio River was attended by steel industry leaders including Ohio-based AK Steel. Trump noted that removing burdensome regulations from businesses appeared to be even more welcomed than tax cuts. After acknowledging the love coming from the coal industry, Trump said steelworkers and oil workers will also be happy with what they see from his administration. “We’ve taken those restrictions and horrible regulations off your companies,” he said. We’re going to have clean, beautiful air and clean, beautiful, crystal clear water, but you can have your jobs also—maybe more than ever before.”
If an affirmative decision is made in the Section 232 investigation, Ross said, three kinds of action could be recommended: tariffs above and beyond the current AD/CVD country-specific duties; quotas limiting the volume of imports; and a hybrid “tariff-rate quota” for specific products with tariffs on volumes that exceed the maximum allowed.
“The overall impact on inflation, were that to be the route, should be relatively modest,” Ross said. “So, we’re very mindful of the need both to protect the domestic steel producers from inappropriate behavior on the part of foreign dumpers, but also to protect the steel consumers, the steel fabricators, the auto companies and everybody else who uses steel.”
Lewis Leibowitz, a Washington trade attorney, believes the administration favors the tariff-rate quota approach, which would have the least impact on inflation and the cost to steel users. “Importers are very apprehensive that any announcement could catch shipments ‘on the water’ that can’t be diverted. That could drive importers out of business as customers cancel orders. The TRQ would at least defer the ‘bite’ of the remedies until after the shipments in transit have arrived,” he said.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.