Trade Cases
DOC to Hold Public Hearing on Section 232 Investigation on Wednesday
Written by John Packard
May 21, 2017
Later this week the U.S. Department of Commerce will hold public hearings for interested parties to voice their opinions regarding the Section 232 (national security) inquiry into the steel industry.
Many believe the conclusion of this investigation was predetermined at the time of the original announcement.
In the Fact Sheet produced by the U.S. Department of Commerce on April 21, 2017 entitled: Frequently Asked Questions: Section 232 Investigations: The Effect of Steel Imports on the National Security the DOC provided clues to the way they are leaning when they asked and answered the following questions:
4. Why has the Secretary of Commerce initiated a Section 232 on steel?
The Secretary initiated the investigation on steel imports in light of the large volumes of excess global steel production and capacity – much of which results from foreign government subsidies and other unfair practices – which distort the U.S. and global steel markets. Steel is used in a variety of commercial, infrastructure and defense applications. The Commerce Department’s January 2017 Steel Industry Executive Summary found that overall U.S. capacity utilization was 71 percent in 2016, a drop from 77.5 percent in 2014. In 2016, import penetration of steel mill products was 25.5 percent. March 2017 steel imports to the United States are 34 percent higher than those in March 2016, a dramatic increase. U.S. Government attempts to address foreign government subsidies and other unfair practices have not ended this distortion. There are 152 antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel products in effect and another 25 investigations underway. The United States has encouraged other countries to reduce and address the underlying causes of excess capacity in the steel market. To date, these efforts have had little practical effect, and have not substantially alleviated the negative effect global excess capacity on the United States steel industry.
5. What does a Section 232 investigation consider?
Section 232 investigations include consideration of: domestic production needed for projected national defense requirements; domestic industry’s capacity to meet those requirements; related human and material resources; the importation of goods in terms of their quantities and use; the close relation of national economic welfare to U.S. national security; loss of skills or investment, substantial unemployment and decrease in government revenue; and the impact of foreign competition on specific domestic industries and the impact of displacement of any domestic products by excessive imports.
Late last week Steel Market Update spoke with Daniel Pearson of the Cato Institute. Pearson is a former International Trade Commission chairman and an expert of international trade. He had requested an opportunity to comment on behalf of free trade at the public hearing to be held this week. Pearson has testified before the Commerce Department on many other occasions but his request to speak this week was denied. As of Sunday evening the list of those speaking has not been made public.
The public hearing will hear speakers for a total of three hours beginning at 10 AM ET on Wednesday, May 24th. The hearing will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Herbert C. Hoover Building, Main Auditorium. You can attend the hearing by registering by no later than Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 5 PM. Here is the link to register: www.bis.doc/232SteelHearing.
The hearing is also available to those unable to attend by Live Streaming which will be available through the same link shown above (www.bis.doc/232SteelHearing).
You may send written comments, data, analyses, or other information pertinent to this investigation no later than May 31, 2017 to Steel232@bis.doc.gov. Or by postal mail to: Brad Botwin, Director, Industrial Studies, Office of Technology Evaluation, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 1093, Washington DC 20230.
SMU Steel Summit Conference 2017 will hear from Daniel Pearson and others on the Section 232 investigation, Section 337 complaint filed by USS against China, Circumvention complaint filed against Vietnam/China as well as the status of the AD/CVD trade duties which will be up for annual review at the time of our conference. We will have a separate panel which will discuss the meaning of “free and fair trade” from various perspectives. Included in that panel will be Philip Bell, President of the Steel Manufacturers Association (steel mills), Daniel Pearson, trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz and we have invited a large manufacturing group to participate in the discussion. You can find out more details about our conference including costs and how to register on our website: www.SteelMarketUpdate.com/Events/Steel-Summit or you can contact our office at 800-432-3475.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Rebar import duties to continue for 5 more years
Import duties on rebar from a handful of countries will continue to be collected for at least another five years.
Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies
China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.
Commerce says Nippon dumped steel in US in 2022-23
Commerce determined a significant dumping margin for hot-rolled steel imports from Japan's Nippon Steel.
Commerce finalizes sunset review of HR import duties
The Commerce Department determined that, if anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders were allowed to expire, or be ‘sunset,’ the illegal dumping and subsidization of HR imports would be likely to continue at sizeable rates.
Commerce delays initial CVD decision in coated case
At the request of domestic petitioners, the Commerce Department has postponed its deadline for making preliminary countervailing duty margin determinations in the coated steel trade case investigations.