Futures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa41b/fa41b690a834a70a94cf84b5020244e7c7f5e6aa" alt=""
Hot Rolled Futures Drop to the Pychological $500 Level
Written by Jack Marshall
September 22, 2016
The following article on the hot rolled coil (HRC) and financial futures markets was written by Jack Marshall of Crunch Risk LLC. Here is how Jack saw trading over the past week:
The focus in HR this past week has been primarily in Q4’16 and 1H’17. Futures prices have dropped to the psychological $500 level and just below for this futures range. We are seeing more interested buyers down at these sub $500 levels however the notional amounts have shrunk as participants behave more cautiously. The levels also represent about a 50% retracement of the price increase from the mid $300 dollar level to the $640 level. The forward discount for this period is running just over $30/ST based on the last reported index release.
We saw Q4’16 and 1H’17 close out last week at $512/ST [$25.60/cwt] and $510/ST [$25.50/cwt] with roughly 13,560 ST trading. This week has been a bit quieter with Q4’16 trading down at $505/ST [ $25.25/cwt] in 1,000 ST for the quarter, and with Q2’17 trading down to $503/ST [$25.15/cwt] in 1,000 ST for the quarter. Following the release of the index on Wednesday Q1’17 traded at $495/ST [$24.75/cwt] in 900 ST for the quarter. Cal’17 also traded at $495/ST in just 200 ST per month.
It is worth noting that the price differential between the spot month future and Cal’17 continues to contract. The end of last month it was $60 and it is now down to $47. It is also surprising that the Cal’17 curve remains basically flat with just a $5 spread between Jan’17 and Dec’17. Not to suggest that past 12 months of futures month end settlements in HR will be a good predictor of future settlements but it is worth noting that only one month settled within $10 of the previous month. Otherwise the average settlement differential between the last 12 futures settlements is $36 with the low being $7 and the high being $104. (CME HR Settlements for Sep’15 $444, Oct’15 $412, Nov’15 $380, Dec’15 $364, Jan’16 $389, Feb’16 $396, Mar’16 $420, Apr’16 $486, May’16 $590, Jun’16 $631, Jul’16 $621, Aug’16 $592.) A new set of circumvent lawsuits submitted to the Commerce department by injured U.S parties against Vietnam steel producers should generate some added volatility to these markets.
Spot 529
Q4’16 502
Q1’17 498
2H’17 493
Cal’17 495
Cal’18 520
However current buying interest in Cal’17 is coming in around $250 GT with 1H’17 last trading at $258/GT.
Scrap (BUS = #1 busheling scrap)
Lower HR prices are impacting BUS price expectations here this week. In the near dates BUS buyers have retreated with Q4’16 last trading last week at $245/GT. Offers remain at $250/ GT for the period in small size. Market sentiment in BUS is a bit bearish but no firm indication on where October will come in yet. Maybe flat to slightly lower. Adding to the bearish sentiment in scrap is that CFR Turkish exports have been slowing down and prices have been declining slightly, down $6 since Monday.
Below are two graphs showing the history of the hot rolled and busheling scrap futures forward curves. You will need to view the graphs on our website to use their interactive features, you can do so by clicking here. If you need assistance with either logging in or navigating the website, please contact our office at 800-432-3475 or info@SteelMarketUpdate.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebb16/ebb165fc3e04d59e52196b36c1bfc79b860c2c58" alt="Jakc Marshall, SMU Contrubutor"
Jack Marshall
Read more from Jack MarshallLatest in Futures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: Meaningful rally grips market
Another eventful week in the physical and financial steel markets is coming to a close. Most importantly, this week provided complete clarity that, after months of waiting for a catalyst, we are now definitively in the early stages of a meaningful rally. The 3rd month future (currently the April contract) rose more than 8% for […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70c4e/70c4e4048a9d6cf1f5a72c6fc6d4da69b5713427" alt=""
HRC and scrap futures: Markets pop on hot steel and tariff headlines
It’s been an event-filled month in US ferrous derivatives markets since my last column for SMU. There’s been no shortage of writings and musing about the ongoing steel and aluminum tariffs proposed by the Trump administration. And steel and scrap futures markets have responded accordingly. CME HRC futures prices have risen, and the curve has firmed. The February 2025 HRC futures contract, now in the pricing period, has added $47 per short ton (st) since its contact lows on Jan. 20 to settle at $767/st today.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: What’s next for HRC and busheling prices?
Since the publication of our last market update on Dec. 10, several notable developments have shaped the landscape
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: Awaiting Trump’s 25% tariff
Midwest HRC indices have been stuck in a tight range since last summer with the weekly CRU Midwest HRC price spending the past 32 weeks between $656 and $714 per short ton (st). The rolling Midwest HRC future has been rangebound between roughly $650 to $800 since last June. The rate at which the price of HRC futures move over a certain period or “volatility” has compressed dramatically over the past few months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: Market coiled and ready to move in 2025?
The last six months have been littered with uncertainty and mixed signals, a choppy and rangebound market. Spot indices have largely held steady, despite the pressure from domestic mills pushing for higher prices on spot tons. This has provided a signal of a lack of upward momentum and little downside room based on mill costs. […]