Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/e115fcbb3ee4ee0c20c60f45eabbe76a.jpg)
China Fights Back Against Trade Restrictions
Written by Sandy Williams
July 26, 2016
China is fighting back on trade restrictions imposed on export of its steel products. On July 22, Baosteel requested the U.S. International Trade Commission to uphold the suspension of the 337 investigation brought by US Steel to block all Chinese carbon and allow steel products from the US market.
Baosteel accused US Steel of trying to obtain relief on products that have already had AD/CVD duties leveled against them.
“U.S. Steel has not — and cannot — disclaim any overlap between its exceedingly broad scope of relief and the dozens of AD/CVD claims — past, present and future,” according to Baosteel’s filing. “First, U.S. steel has already received relief for dozens of categories of carbon and alloy steel products for which AD/CVD proceedings have been completed. It should not be allowed now to get a second bite at the apple it already ate.”
In another backlash to trade restrictions, China’s Ministry of Commerce said on Sunday it would impose antidumping duties on imports of grain-oriented electrical steel from Japan, South Korea, and the European Union. China claims that underpriced steel from the three countries is causing injury to domestic steel producers. Duties ranging from 37.3 percent to 46.3 percent will be imposed, said the Ministry.
These responses, and others, have come as a result to an onslaught of trade duties levied on steel products China exports to numerous countries. In just the last few weeks, Brazil imposed duties steel tubes from China, Mexico extended tariffs on cold rolled coil from China, and India mills filed petitions against dumping of Chinese wire rod.
US steel manufacturers have successfully petitioned and won AD/CVD cases on imports of corrosion resistant steel and cold rolled steel in the past month.
In 2015, 37 investigations were initiated against Chinese steel exports worldwide. China claims it is not trying to subvert market rules but that lower production costs allow it to offer its products at lower prices.
Following the final determination of duties on cold-rolled and corrosion resistant steel the China Ministry of Commerce said, “With regard to the United States’ mistaken methods that violate WTO rules, China is and will continue to take all measures, including filing suit at the WTO, to strive for fair treatment for enterprises and safeguard their export interests.”
The Ministry has said that U.S. protectionist measures will make the U.S. steel industry less competitive, and thus may harm the economy.
Said trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz in an email to SMU, “The Chinese are essentially correct–while we read a lot about Chinese violation of trade rules in this country, the press does not write about U.S. violations, which are probably more numerous than the Chinese. Most have to do with the administration of trade remedy laws (antidumping and countervailing duties). The Chinese are also correct in that closing the U.S. market to international competition (not just from China) will do lasting damage to U.S. manufacturing of products made from steel and will keep the steel industry from making necessary changes to modernize.”
The World Trade Organization is called on to intervene in many trade case disputes. The WTO lists China as a primary respondent in 35 trade disputes and as a third party respondent in 131 disputes (not exclusive to steel).
Interestingly, the U.S. is a primary respondent in 126 disputes and a third party in 132. The U.S. is currently a complainant in 110 disputes compared to China’s 13.
The chart below illustrates disputes the U.S. has either filed with the WTO or is a recipient of. As you can see, the U.S. has issues with almost every manufacturing nation on the map.
Whether trade suits are a product of protectionism or legitimate remedies to correct unfair trade practices depends on how the resulting duties impact affected industries. To the steel industry, it is a necessary step to protect domestic industry interest and level the playing field. To the downstream manufacturer it can be viewed as an unwelcome restriction on available raw materials to make the products it sells in or exports from the U.S.
In a recent comment on the cold-rolled steel case determination, AISI president and CEO Thomas Gibson said, “The U.S. trade remedy laws are the only means by which domestic industry can begin to mitigate the devastating impact from dumped and subsidized foreign imports.” His sentiment is echoed by U.S. steel producers, politicians and the United Steelworkers.
The American Institute for International Steel says the proliferation of antidumping duties is protectionism that comes at a cost to the U.S. economy. In September 2016, Lawrence Hanson, an attorney for AIIS told an ITC hearing on proposed duties for hot-rolled steel flat products would “would result in a negative effect upon the steel supply chain and, as a result, inhibit economic growth.”
A correlation has been found between improvements in trade facilitation and increased trade volume, said Hanson, and added that the inverse is also true.
“A decrease in trade translates directly into stunting economic growth,” said Hanson. “Those are precisely the kind of problems that barriers to free trade can produce. Within the steel industry, fewer restrictions upon the international steel supply chain mean greater efficiency and, therefore, increased growth.”
Trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz will discuss these issues and more at the 2016 Steel Summit in Atlanta, Georgia on August 29-31.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/galvanized_coil.png)
Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel
Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/investigate.png)
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant steel.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations
US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/cbd2ad03f626e665deb71b2742b25bbb.jpg)
Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election
Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US senators urge reduction to S. Korean OCTG quota
https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-casey-fetterman-biden-administration-level-playing-field-american-octg-industry