Trade Cases
ITC Temporarily Suspends Section 337 Case
Written by Sandy Williams
July 10, 2016
The U.S. International Trade Commission has put the Section 337 case brought by US Steel against Chinese steel companies on hold until Oct. 2, 2017.
Administrative Law Judge Dee Lord said that two of the three complaints in the case, price fixing and transshipment, belong under the purview of antidumping and countervailing duty laws that which are handled by the Commerce Department.
Inside U.S. Trade reported that the ITC decision said, “The false designation of origin claims are based on respondents’ alleged evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders issued by the Commerce Department, which has several ongoing investigations. The record therefore shows that the false designation at least ‘in part’ falls within the purview of antidumping and countervailing duty laws. This requires the ITC to notify the Secretary of Commerce under section 337 (b)(3), according to the order.”
Judge Lord said “there is no evidence in the record” that Commerce had been notified of the investigation as required by law.
The third claim of the 337 case, missapropriation and use of trade secrets, could result in the ITC consulting with or handing over that portion of the investigation to the Criminal Division of the Justice Department. A decision to notify the Justice Department is not required by law.
The suspension of the case means that the ITC will pause all discovery and motions for the investigation until October 2017.
In the 337 complaint, US Steel requested that the USITC issue a general exclusion order on carbon and alloy steel products imports from China, a limited exclusion order blocking imports from the named respondents in the investigation, and a cease and desist order on alleged illegal practices.
US Steel spokesperson, Sarah Cassella said, “We’re reviewing the actions the administrative law judge has taken.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.