Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb054/eb054bd6f2edf019f27a50e3b5dccb494b7c4f77" alt=""
USITC Finds Injury in China and Japan Cold-Rolled Steel Case
Written by Sandy Williams
June 23, 2016
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced today (June 22, 2016) that it finds that unfairly priced and subsidized imports of cold-rolled steel flat products from China and Japan have hurt U.S. steel producers.
All six commissioners voted in the affirmative. As a result, the antidumping and countervailing duties determined by the DOC in their final decision on May 17 will be issued by Commerce.
The ITC, unlike the Department of Commerce (DOC), did not find critical circumstances in regards to these imports and, as a result, the goods will not be subject to retroactive countervailing or antidumping duties.
Subject to final adjustment, the following dumping margins and subsidy rates determined by the DOC in May, after the companies under investigation failed to respond to Commerce’s request for information, will now be collected.
The original complaint against the steel producers in China and Japan was filed in July 2015 by US Steel, AK Steel, ArcelorMittal USA, Nucor, and Steel Dynamics Inc. The DOC is expected to issue its final decision with respect to the remaining countries (Brazil, India, Korea, Russia, and the United Kingdom) in July and the ITC will then make a separate injury determination on those countries.
The products included in these investigations are certain cold rolled, flat rolled steel products, whether or not annealed, painted, varnished or coated with plastic or other non-metallic substances.
Response to ITC Decision
United Steelworkers International President Leo Gerard said the USW will continue to fight for American jobs and to change U.S. trade policies to ensure a fair trade approach. Gerard released the following statement on the ITC decision:
“Today’s vote signals to steelworkers that more help is on the way. They have been watching as foreign competitors targeted the products they made and the jobs they held by subsidizing and dumping imports into our market. They have waited far too long — almost a year since this case was filed — for the deserved relief that they so desperately needed along with restoration of fair market conditions.
“Our companies and workers play by the rules. Too many of our competitors illegally employ actions that undermine our markets and take our jobs. Today’s decision addresses an important product segment in our domestic steel sector. But, because of the way our laws work, other affirmative final decisions by the ITC will be needed to provide relief to thousands of other workers. Without a comprehensive approach by our government, we have to cobble together relief. This is time consuming, expensive and unfair to those whose jobs have been under attack.”
ArcelorMittal USA called the USITC decision “a victory for the steel industry.”
Jim Baske, CEO, ArcelorMittal North America said, “ArcelorMittal is pleased with today’s final ruling regarding anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations on cold-rolled steel imports from China and Japan. We applaud the work done by the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) to address unfairly traded imports and level the playing field.”
John Ferriola, President and CEO, Nucor Corp. said, “These final determinations by the International Trade Commission confirm that the U.S. steel industry has suffered harmful effects from imports of dumped and subsidized cold-rolled steel. Today’s decision is an important step in returning fair trade to the U.S. flat rolled steel market, and sends a clear message that all countries must play by the rules of international trade and will be held accountable for failure to do so.”
SMU Note: Yesterday we received a note from one of our trading contacts who advised us that they had to divert 18,000 tons of cold rolled from China to Hamilton, Ontario, Canada due to the dumping suits. So, there definitely is an impact and from our perspective the 6-0 vote within the ITC could very well signal that all of the other AD/CVD suits will have similar results.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b83/11b839fc6967d9cfa28d1af34341b98320ce962c" alt=""
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bef95/bef9521b0f9e881d0568a3fe3d45a242dc1ecb8c" alt=""
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.