Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d70c1/d70c16ef480ea3531fe28355c498aab77167d1db" alt=""
Passage of New Bill Potentially Gives Manufacturers Relief from Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
May 25, 2016
The American Manufacturing and Competitiveness Act of 2016 was passed by Congress and signed into law on May 20, 2016. The bill H.R. 4923 creates a transparent process for businesses to request duty suspensions and reductions on imported products for which there is no, or insufficient, domestic availability.
The bill calls for regular updates to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to suspend or reduce duties on goods that affect the competitiveness of American manufacturers.
Businesses can submit petitions directly to the ITC requesting an analysis of duties on specified products. The ITC will solicit comments from the public and from the Administration and submit its recommendations to the Ways and Means committee
Ways and Means will then examine the ITC recommendations and draft a Miscellaneous Tariff Bill (MTB) proposal. The process is transparent and will certify there are no spending earmarks and publish a list of any limited tariff benefits (LTB).
The bill, according to trade attorney Lewis E. Leibowitz (Lewis.Leibowitz@lellawoffice.com), does not affect steel since the U.S. does not have any tariffs on steel being imported into the United States. He also told SMU that the bill does not protect a company against antidumping and countervailing duty charges.
House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) remarked following passage of the bill by the House:
“This legislation is formally called the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill, or MTB for short. But it makes more sense to think of this as an MTB of another kind – legislation providing “Manufacturing Tax Breaks” – plain and simple.
“Since 2012, American manufacturers have had to pay full tariffs – border taxes, in essence – for certain imported products not made in the U.S., unnecessarily increasing their costs. These tariffs have cost them $748 million annually, and there has been no opportunity for them to get relief from these taxes. These border taxes in turn have made it harder for them to sell their products, grow their business, create jobs, and invest in their communities.”
“By passing this bill today, we’re taking a tremendous step to ensure that we finally have a system in place that helps our manufacturers compete in the global market – and win.”
Phil Gibbs, analyst at Key Banc Capital Markets, commented that the recent trade determinations on corrosion resistant steel imports are stronger than anticipated and “could send a message to U.S. buyers procuring material from nations currently perceived as ‘safe havens,’ including those currently not named in the pending trade cases.”
Said Gibbs in a note to clients, “While we see this outcome as supportive of near-term supply constraints and near-term pricing resilience into 3Q16, particularly for downstream galvanized products, the recent passage of The American Manufacturing and Competitiveness Act of 2016, which puts in place a process to eliminate tariffs on inputs and other products that are not produced or available in the United States, and potential appeals from overseas mills, could challenge the sustainability or enforcement of duties at face. These countermeasures, however, could take some time to enforce.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b83/11b839fc6967d9cfa28d1af34341b98320ce962c" alt=""
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.