Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/3081e33dd1818150d4c280743b36c050.jpg)
USS Section 337 Complaint Accuses Chinese Traders of Falsifying Origin
Written by Sandy Williams
April 27, 2016
US Steel maintains that Chinese manufacturers and distributors use false documents and transship products through other countries to disguise the country of origin.
Numerous antidumping and countervailing duty orders have been placed on Chinese steel products over the years. US Steel maintains that China continues to circumvent these orders by using such methods in violation of the Lanham Act 15 U.S. Code § 1125. The Lanham (Trademark) Act was first enacted in July 1946 to prohibit activities such as trademark infringement, trademark dilution and false advertising.
The Act specifically prohibits false designations of origin and false descriptions of goods and service used in commerce which:
- is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or
- in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s goods, services, or commercial activities.
Such actions are subject to civil action and include governmental entities. The Act further states:
Any goods marked or labeled in contravention of the provisions of this section shall not be imported into the United States or admitted to entry at any customhouse of the United States.
US Steel states in the Section 337 filing that import records suggest that Chinese manufacturers and distributors transship significant volume to the U.S. to disguise the origin of Chinese steel.
Import records are cited which show the jump in OCTG volumes from Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan and Vietnam after the AD/CVD duties were ordered on Chinese OCTG products in 2009. The pattern was repeated as Commerce initiated AD/CVD duties on corrosion-resistant steel and cold-rolled steel imports in 2015.
A specific example of transshipment was given for Tianjin Tiangang Guanye Co., LTD (TTG), a distributor for Baosteel and Ansteel and other Chinese steel manufacturers.
In March 2016 a prospective customer contacted TTG regarding purchase of cold-rolled steel products and expressed concern about U.S. duty costs. TTF offered to use “entrepot trade.” The TTG representative explained:
We export the goods to Thailand. when the goods arrive thailand, our agent will receive the goods, and they will export the goods to you with their company name. (Goods made in china from us) And there is no special handle from yourside. our agent will handle CIF Port Elizabeth for you. so it is same import procedures from china. Only different point the goods delivery port from Laem Chabang Port Thailand. but goods from us made in china.
(Note: the emphasis was included in the original communique.)
A clarification was provided by TTF that the Bill of Lading would show Thailand but the prospect would receive an emailed mill test certification showing the steel was made in China. The certificate listed Baosteel Iron & Steel Co. as the original mill.
Several examples of false transactions like this one are detailed in the 337 filing.
US Steel notes that Chinese manufacturers exported 112.4 million metric tons of steel worldwide in 2016, 2 million tons which the U.S. Census Bureau reports was exported to the U.S. That 2 million tons is vastly understated, however, says US Steel, due to transshipment fraud.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/galvanized_coil.png)
Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel
Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/investigate.png)
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant steel.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations
US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/cbd2ad03f626e665deb71b2742b25bbb.jpg)
Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election
Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US senators urge reduction to S. Korean OCTG quota
https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-casey-fetterman-biden-administration-level-playing-field-american-octg-industry