Futures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5742d/5742dfd25e40c32dd086c805261837eb816a8afb" alt=""
Hot Rolled Futures: More Futures Interest This Week
Written by Andre Marshall
February 25, 2016
The following article on the hot rolled coil (HRC), busheling scrap (BUS), and financial futures markets was written by Jack Marshall of Crunch Risk LLC. Here is how Jack saw trading over the past week:
Steel (HRC)
The CME HR spot month future settlement reflects minimal price movements in physical markets this month as the front month settlement of $396/ST [$19.80cwt] is barely changed from last week. However, there is a flicker of optimism this week in a market that is otherwise over-shadowed by bearish sentiment. We have seen more futures interest this week as buyers came into the market likely in response to higher iron ore prices and higher export scrap prices. Some mixed signals persist such as mill capacity utilization rates continue to move modestly higher, lead-times for HR seem mired at around 3.5 weeks while CR and Coated are getting longer, and concern import duty cases might have less impact than originally expected.
The current slope of the settlement values for the CME HR curve is very gradual with Mar/Jun’16 @$402 ST up $2 from last week, 2H’16 @ $410 up just under $5 from last week, 1H’17 @ $414 up just under $4 from last week, and 2H’17 @ $416 up just over $2 from last week. Continued compression of HR futures settlement values reflect limited scope for significantly higher prices out the next 18 months as there is less than a $20 spread between the spot month versus 18 month.
For the second consecutive Friday we had an active day in HR futures with activity mainly focused on 2H’16. Mar’16 traded @ $399 ST [$19.95cwt], May’16 traded @ $400 ST [$20.00cwt], and 2H’16 traded @ $407 ST [$20.35cwt].
Monday we had a light day with the focus being on the nearby months as Mar’16 and Apr’16 traded @ $400 ST [$20.00cwt] and Jun’16 traded @ $405 ST [$20.25cwt]. The large jump in iron ore prices this week continued the upward trend from last week and seems to have spurred some HR buying interest from hedgers who have been sitting on the sidelines.
Today the HR futures market focus has been on Q2’16. It initially traded @$402 ST [$20.10cwt], was followed @$405 ST [$20.25cwt] then @$407 ST [$20.35cwt] then @$408 ST [$20.40cwt]. Since our last update HR futures have traded 36,860 ST and open interest in the HR contract stands at 543,180 ST (27,159 contracts).
Below is a graphic of the HRC Futures Forward Curve. The interactive capabilities of the graph can only be used in Steel Market Update website here. If you have any issues logging in or navigating the website please contact us at info@steelmarketupdate.com or (800) 432 3475.
Scrap
After no movement of significance for most of the last week CFR Turkish scrap prices moved sharply higher on the day and hit the mid $180 to $190 mark. In short order CFR Turkey scrap has recovered from its recent slide as Turkish mills which have been running tight scrap inventories move to re-supply due to upcoming import tariff concerns. Also stronger China prices on semi-finished steel exports and higher iron ore prices are changing the alternatives mix just as Turkish mills are looking to re-supply for Q2’16 orders. Midwest #1 Busheling scrap market chatter has prices for BUS sideways to up slightly for Mar’16.
Mar’16 offered @ $190/GT
Apr’16 offered @ $190/GT
May’16 offered @ $190/GT
Jun’16 offered @ $190/GT
2H’16 offered @ $215/GT
Andre Marshall
Read more from Andre MarshallLatest in Futures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: Meaningful rally grips market
Another eventful week in the physical and financial steel markets is coming to a close. Most importantly, this week provided complete clarity that, after months of waiting for a catalyst, we are now definitively in the early stages of a meaningful rally. The 3rd month future (currently the April contract) rose more than 8% for […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70c4e/70c4e4048a9d6cf1f5a72c6fc6d4da69b5713427" alt=""
HRC and scrap futures: Markets pop on hot steel and tariff headlines
It’s been an event-filled month in US ferrous derivatives markets since my last column for SMU. There’s been no shortage of writings and musing about the ongoing steel and aluminum tariffs proposed by the Trump administration. And steel and scrap futures markets have responded accordingly. CME HRC futures prices have risen, and the curve has firmed. The February 2025 HRC futures contract, now in the pricing period, has added $47 per short ton (st) since its contact lows on Jan. 20 to settle at $767/st today.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: What’s next for HRC and busheling prices?
Since the publication of our last market update on Dec. 10, several notable developments have shaped the landscape
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: Awaiting Trump’s 25% tariff
Midwest HRC indices have been stuck in a tight range since last summer with the weekly CRU Midwest HRC price spending the past 32 weeks between $656 and $714 per short ton (st). The rolling Midwest HRC future has been rangebound between roughly $650 to $800 since last June. The rate at which the price of HRC futures move over a certain period or “volatility” has compressed dramatically over the past few months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/957bd/957bd28b14047b083ebea3ba4d3b6471cf687103" alt=""
HR Futures: Market coiled and ready to move in 2025?
The last six months have been littered with uncertainty and mixed signals, a choppy and rangebound market. Spot indices have largely held steady, despite the pressure from domestic mills pushing for higher prices on spot tons. This has provided a signal of a lack of upward momentum and little downside room based on mill costs. […]