Letter to the Editor: Come On CISA...Really?!?

And to refer to the Chinese steel industry as the victim of anything is utterly preposterous. The victims of this situation are the steel producers in the various destination markets for such exports, along with the distributors in those countries, whose inventories get devalued overnight by the arrival of these Chinese shipments.
 
As to any measures CISA claims the Chinese steel industry has taken or will take to solve these problems by cutting obsolete capacity, that is nothing but a sad joke. We have been asked to listen to this broken record for many, many years, but nothing ever happens, so this is really getting old. Anybody only slightly familiar with the Chinese steel industry knows that many of the older and obsolete mills are located away from the large cities and industrial centers, and that their mostly private owners are in cahoots with the local party bosses, whose main concern is employment and whose priority is not the observance of orders coming from Beijing.The other part of the overcapacity problem is that new capacity was still being built long after it was obvious that there was no domestic demand to absorb it. And after having expanded their capacity to 140 or 150% of domestic demand, what exactly does CISA mean by “promoting the smooth development of the global steel industry?
 
Last, CISA seem to insinuate that their exports are responding to demand in overseas markets, by claiming their exports are the result of  “market forces”. Yeah, if your product is 10, 20 or 30% cheaper than the next guy’s, some buyers who are not concerned too much about quality will buy it. As to its alleged popularity, I know of people who were unaware that the steel they bought contained boron, which makes the steel brittle and thus unsuitable for certain applications like pipe making. Boron also makes the steel an alloy in the eyes of the Chinese export authorities, resulting in a higher rebate for the shipper, and the eyes of US Customs, which used to enable the Chinese to circumvent US dumping duties for the carbon product  –  until of course the US mills put a stop to that.
 
I have spent most of my working life in steel trade and have dealt with many, many different countries. The serious problems I have experienced in dealing with Chinese suppliers outweigh those I had with all others combined. Most of my distributor customers now tell me they will not accept steel made in the PRC, often because their fabricator customers won’t touch it.
 
And to deviate just for a moment! The AISI is not entirely correct when blaming Chinese exports for the rather robust US import numbers, that are only coming down now. There are dumping duties on the books here for many if not most Chinese steel products, thus preventing those products to come here. However, Chinese exports to third countries will often replace imports from other exporting countries, who are then forced to look for alternative markets, including the U.S.

Peter Brebach