Trade Cases

Trade Attorney Questions Likeliness of a Section 201 Investigation
Written by John Packard
November 24, 2015
Recently, US Steel CEO Mario Longhi was quoted as saying that a Section 201 investigation may be needed to save the domestic steel industry.
We want our readers to learn more about what a Section 201 means so we enlisted the help of trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz who was actively involved in the last Section 201 filing back in 2001. This is what Lewis reported to Steel Market Update this afternoon:
You asked about the steel Safeguard action in 2001. That was self-initiated by the President in mid-2001 and resulted in a finding of “serious injury” by the International Trade Commission and a presidential Proclamation in March 2002.
There were some valuable lessons learned from that action that makes it unlikely to be repeated.
First, the steel tariffs resulted in many more job losses in steel-using industries than any jobs saved (essentially none were created) in steel production. A study in 2003 concluded that more jobs were lost in the first year of steel tariffs (2002-03) than existed in the steel industry. So there is no free lunch.
Second, major steel exporting countries brought the US to the WTO immediately after relief was granted. The WTO found that on two major legal grounds (no finding of “unforeseen circumstances” leading to the injury and inadequate evidence that increased imports directly caused the injury). The US Safeguards statute, which was enacted in 1975, long before the Uruguay Round agreements were finalized, does not provide for such findings. For a new case to be brought, the statute would need to be amended. This has not taken place—nor has there been a serious effort to do so.
Third, the politics in 2002-03 were quite different from the current situation. Steel workers were given relief in the hope that they would give credit to the Bush Administration for helping the industry adjust to new conditions of competition. But in 2003, the USW endorsed Dick Gephardt for President and said that any of the 8 candidates running for President on the Democratic side would be better than the Republican currently occupying the White House. See the Wall Street Journal editorial from August 2003 (“Steel Thyself, Karl Rove”).
The steel industry can always file a Section 201 petition. But that seems unlikely while the AD/CVD investigations are pending. A petition would be less well-received than a self-initiated petition. But the President would alienate Europe, Japan, Canada, Mexico and other TPP partners just when the agreement is coming up for approval in 12 parliaments (including our own).
The issue of free trade, the existing antidumping and countervailing duties trade cases, critical circumstances and now Section 201 suggestions as the next step for the steel industry – these subjects are critically important to manufacturing, distribution, trading companies as well as the domestic steel mills themselves who initiate these cases. Trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz will be holding court at our first Leadership Summit Conference in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida on March 7-9, 2016. We are limiting the number of attendees to less than 100 for this conference. Registration is open and available on our website or through our office: 800-432-3475.

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases

SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.

CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America

Price on trade: A lot happened last week – and it wasn’t all about tariffs
Should foreign investment be allowed to reshape the American steel Industry? Not to be lost in the recent on-again-off-again tariff frenzy, Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of U.S. Steel has also found itself in President Trump’s crosshairs when it comes to trade and industrial policy. Nippon Steel initially announced its nearly $15-billion bid for U.S. Steel […]

Trump signs executive order aimed at making US shipbuilding ‘great again’
President Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order meant to breathe new life into American shipbuilding and curb Chinese dominance in the sector.

Trump still against selling USS to Japanese firm: Report
Despite ordering a new review of Nippon Steel’s bid for U.S. Steel, President Trump said he is still against selling USS to a Japanese company, according to media reports.