Steel Mills
HARDI Members Seeing Stronger Demand
Written by John Packard
June 24, 2014
Steel Market Update participated in the monthly galvanized steel conference call sponsored by HARDI. Once per month, HARDI (Heating, Air-conditioning, Refrigeration, Distributors International) conducts a call amongst the HVAC wholesalers and supporting companies about the status of the hot dipped galvanized sheet and coil markets.
The very first thing which needs to be mentioned is the vast majority of HARDI wholesalers are of the opinion that demand has improved. “Demand has been relatively strong,” reported one East Coast wholesaler, “I am turning into a net optimist.”
On the West Coast, Midwest and Southeast we heard similar comments. One of the Southeast wholesalers reported, “We had a good April, May and now June. We have seen a slip [in pricing] at the mill level but, we haven’t seen a change in the attitude on the street.”
A large galvanized service center which is also a HARDI member told the group that they look at the market in three ways: short term, medium term and then the longer term view.
In the short term, they reported galvanized steel prices as “definitely softening” with most of the softening coming from mills other than ArcelorMittal, US Steel and AK Steel. “Construction based coaters and converters are where you are seeing the softening,” is how this service center described the market to the HARDI wholesalers.
He also reported that the market is very product specific and regional right now. “Cold rolled in the Mid-Atlantic is different than galvanized 60″ wide coil in the Midwest.”
The service center reported that the short term is seeing holes in inventories which is making the spot market quite robust.
Over the mid-term, the issue of raw material input costs, such as iron ore which late last week was trading on the spot market in China in the low $90’s as opposed to $120’s, along with imported steel will pressure the market and market pricing.
Longer term, there are two main issues which are of concern to this service center and many of the HARDI wholesalers. The threat of trade cases against galvanized steel and the myriad of transportation issues which are plaguing the steel industry.
A number of comments expressed the sentiment that we are close to the bottom of the cycle. “How much do we have left to fall. I don’t think there is much left in this cycle,” is what one HARDI member reported to the group. He went on to say, “If you are waiting for prices to fall before buying up, you probably are not going to get that fall.”
Competition continues to be an issue in all areas east of the Rocky Mountains as service centers sell material at less than what they should be getting (in the wholesalers view) in the marketplace. This has been an issue for a number of months and prices rising or falling doesn’t seem to make it go away.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills
Algoma to shut down line in Ontario ahead of EAF start
The 106” Mill was part of Algoma's plate and strip combination facility.
Nippon trial vs. US government to begin early next month: Report
Nippon Steel’s litigation against the US government is set to begin in early February, according to a report by Japan’s Kyodo News Agency. Nippon will file its opening brief on Feb. 3. And both parties will conclude their claims by March 17 in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Kyodo […]
Nucor carbon targets certified by GSCC
Nucor’s “ambitious” carbon targets by the end of the decade and beyond have been certified by the Global Steel Climate Council (GSCC). The Charlotte, N.C.-based steelmaker used a base year of 2023 for its science-based emissions targets (SBET). It set an SBET of 0.975 metric tons (mt) of CO2 emissions per mt of hot-rolled steel […]
SSAB halts talks with Feds on Miss. green steel plant
The Department of Energy's Industrial Demonstrations Program page states that it is no longer moving forward with SSAB.
Cleveland-Cliffs CEO seeks ‘American solution’ for U.S. Steel
He said a new entity would operate under the U.S. Steel name and would retain its Pittsburgh headquarters.