SMU Data and Models
Steel Buyers Basics: Mill Coating Extras
Written by Mario Briccetti
November 22, 2013
Last week I discussed how Steel Mills calculate thickness and width extras. This week we will look at Mill coating extras for Galvanized and Galvalume coated steel coil. I am going to refer again to US Steel’s published list of price extras which you can find on their website. Other mills tend to have similar extras but it is important to compare as there can be variations which can be significant depending on the product and thickness.
The US Steel’s pricing extras for Hot Dipped Galvanized/Galvannealed coil chart (HDG) begins on page 23. The base price of HDG coil tends to be about $100 to $120 per ton higher than hot rolled coil so I will use a base price of $38.00/cwt. (SMU latest hot rolled average is $33.25/cwt but for ease of use and example purposes we will use a $38.00/cwt base for coated products.)
For HDG coil there is a thickness and width extra chart and an additional extra chart related to the coating weight of Zinc being put on the substrate. The first chart is similar to what we have seen before – extras based on the thickness/width of the coil. For instance for US Steel’s Fairfield Mill the width/thickness extra for 0.015” min x 40” coil is $3.50/cwt.
However, the second chart for coating extras we have not seen before. Here is an example based on coil thickness (note that width is not relevant for coating weight extras):
If your coil specification is 0.015” min G90 then your coating weight adder (extra) is $10.35/cwt using the first line of the table referenced above. It would be unwise to specify 0.0149” min thickness since that increases the extra cost for G90 from $10.35/cwt to $12.00/cwt. The extra footage gained would not justify the extra cost.
Hot Dipped Galvanized, just like Hot Rolled and Cold Rolled coil, has a series of other extras related to steel grade and processing.
In the US Steel price book, following the HDG extras section, the Galvalume and Electrolytic Galvanized pricing extras are shown. The pricing in that section is different than Galvanized but is presented in the same fashion as shown above.
Next time a shift of gears to a more general point of view on purchasing.
Mario Briccetti
Read more from Mario BriccettiLatest in SMU Data and Models
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices stable to start 2025
Both SMU Steel Buyers' Sentiment Indices remain in positive territory, indicating that steel buyers are optimistic about the success of their businesses.
SMU Survey: Mill lead times short and steady to start 2025
Buyers participating in our first market survey of 2025 reported a slight decline in mill lead times compared to our last survey in mid-December. After rising moderately in early December, lead times edged lower through this week and are now only slightly above the lows seen back in July and November. Overall, production times have remained historically short since last summer, with minimal movement since then.
SMU’s December at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of important steel market metrics for the previous month. Our latest report includes data updated through December 31st.
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices contrast at year end
Both of our Sentiment Indices remain in positive territory and indicate that steel buyers are optimistic about the success of their businesses.
SMU Survey: Mill lead times contract slightly, remain short
Steel mill production times have seen very little change since September, according to buyers participating in our latest market survey.