Steel Mills
A Contract Pendulum Swing Could Impact Mill Order Books
Written by John Packard
October 13, 2013
The following is an email we received from a service center executive regarding the current contract negotiations and their opinion as to how changes can change the mix of contracts to spot orders on with a mill and, price volatility in the marketplace. We have heard the same argument from others within the steel industry who believe the changes being requested by the domestic steel mills will create more volatility in the spot markets.
The pendulum has moved back and forth over the years, with the mills sometimes having majority contracts/lower spot books to sometimes having majority spot books/lower contracts. While the mills may be convinced (wrongly I believe) that the Index based pricing has been detrimental to their bottom lines, there likely were many benefits that came about as a result of the index model:
The market moved into one of the most stable periods in recent times. Efficiencies increased, predictive volumes allowed mills to plan and execute production better, mill on-time deliveries improved dramatically, end-users and service centers were able to reduce inventories since they were buying regular amounts each month. The need/want to take on speculative physical volumes to protect against a wild move up in price shrank away. As a result, volatility reduced significantly, and pricing became more stable – relative to the recent past.
And to the mills’ point that the Index-based model is negative for their bottom lines, mills (especially EAF producers) are making very good returns right now – with the Index-model very much still in place. Why is that? Oh, because fundamentals always dictate price: demand is steady, inventories are low, production was lost due to outages, and imports were relatively low. So, supply went down, demand held steady, and presto! Prices rose!
If the pendulum swings back to mills having majority Spot order books, they still won’t be able to control the price, but we will likely see a return to higher volatility, with bigger moves up and down, lost efficiencies, etc.
Steel Market Update welcomes your thoughts on the subject. You can email them to: John@SteelMarketUpdate.com
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills
AISI: Weekly raw steel output ticks higher
The volume of raw steel produced by US mills slightly increased last week, according to American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) data. Last week’s production rate represents the second-highest level recorded this year.
Opening briefs filed in Nippon/USS lawsuit vs. US government
Together, Nippon Steel, Nippon Steel North America, and U.S. Steel announced the filing of their opening brief in their litigation to invalidate the government’s decision to block their announced merger. The brief lays out “how President Biden made a predetermined decision for political reasons, not national security, causing CFIUS to engage in a sham review […]
Cliffs blames muted auto demand for steep losses in 2024
Muted demand from the auto industry took a particular toll later in the year.
U.S. Steel losses widen, better times seen as BR2 ramp-up continues
U.S. Steel’s losses widened in the fourth quarter on lower steel prices, weaker demand, and startup costs relating to the expansion of its Big River Steel EAF sheet mill in Arkansas. But the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker said it expected results to improve in 2025 as Big River 2 – the project to double capacity at the Osceola, Ark., mill - gains steam.
Nucor set to soon bring plenty of new capacity online
The projects collectively represent ~65% of Nucor’s capital expenditures budget for this year.