Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c15/d4c15916fad4b0cb52a7271e5e30231a84de6f4e" alt=""
Canada sees Chinese steel, ali imports falling ~50% on tariffs
Written by Ethan Bernard
December 6, 2024
The Canadian government estimates that steel and aluminum imports from China will decrease by nearly 50% due to newly implemented tariffs.
This was according to a behavioral response estimated by the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux, which was released on Thursday.
Additionally, the report said the government expects that the recent steel and aluminum tariffs, along with electric vehicle (EV) tariffs on the Asian nation, will raise federal revenues by Canadian $473 million ($334 million USD) by 2028-29.
Recall that the Canadian federal government implemented a 100% tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles imported into Canada on Oct. 1. Then on Oct. 22, it also placed a 25% tariff on imports of steel and aluminum products from China. (A remission request process – for companies seeking exemptions from the tariffs – was launched on Oct. 18.)
The government anticipates a revenue jump of CAD$217.7 million from the Chinese steel and aluminum tariffs alone in 2024-25.
As previously reported, China announced in October that it would dispute the tariffs at the World Trade Organization (WTO).
CSPA cheers
Catherine Cobden, president and CEO of the Canadian Steel Producers Association (CSPA), praised the report.
“The report confirms that the imposition of tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum will slow imports of unfairly traded, high-carbon products into Canada; protect Canadian jobs and communities that rely on our sector’s strength, all while having a negligible impact on Canada’s economy,” she said in a statement on Thursday.
“Our hope is that these trade measures signal how North American partners can align our policies to support our workers against the real trade threat that is global overcapacity in steel from China,” Cobden added.
Additionally, Cobden told SMU that “these tariffs on Chinese steel products completely align with the Section 301 tariffs of the United States.”
She noted that, along with new monitoring requirements on all imports, “these tariffs further strengthen the alignment between Canada and Unites States for steel trade.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1f62/a1f623348039b4c23ddd6b6fba2c61ea9acadbcd" alt=""
Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.