Trade Cases
Commerce launches investigation into imports of coated flat-rolled steel
Written by Laura Miller
September 26, 2024
The US Department of Commerce on Thursday announced it would initiate investigations into coated steel imports from ten trading partners.
Case initiation by Commerce is the first step in antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) proceedings after a petition is filed. The agency now has 140 and 65 days to complete the preliminary phases of the respective AD and CVD investigations.
Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI), Nucor, U.S. Steel, Wheeling-Nippon Steel, and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed petitions on Sept. 5 requesting duties be imposed on imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel. The petitions cover zinc and aluminum-coated steel sheet products, including galvanized coil and aluminized sheet products.
The petitions allege the selling of CORE flat-rolled steel imports below fair value by Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Vietnam.
Domestic petitioners also contend that producers in Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and Vietnam are receiving illegal government subsidies.
Note that SDI and Nucor are the only petitioners seeking duties on Canadian CORE products.
And while SDI, USS, USW, and Wheeling-Nippon are requesting them for Mexico, Nucor is not.
Alleged dumping and subsidy margins
The alleged dumping margins in Commerce’s case initiation announcement on Thursday, shown below, differ slightly from the ones alleged in the original petition.
Updated alleged margins
Trading partner | Alleged dumping margins |
---|---|
Australia | 45.86 – 51.79% |
Brazil | 52.03 – 107.67% |
Canada | 19.73 – 52.08% |
Mexico | 27.46 – 41.94% |
The Netherlands | 12.70 – 20.51% |
South Africa | 53.81 – 53.86% |
Taiwan | 67.81% |
Turkey | 18.30 – 34.59% |
UAE | 77.09 – 78.53% |
Vietnam | 195.23% |
Alleged subsidy rates | |
Brazil | Above de minimis* |
Canada | Above de minimis* |
Mexico | Above de minimis* |
Vietnam | Above de minimis* |
*de minimis = less than 1% for developed countries, less than 2% for developing countries |
Cumulation of imports
The petitions ask the International Trade Commission (ITC) to cumulate CORE imports from the named countries when making its injury determinations.
SMU understands the ITC must cumulate import volumes if petitions are filed on the same day and the same product against two or more countries, as they were in this case.
As the World Trade Organization notes on cumulation, “Since such analysis will increase the volume of imports whose impact is being considered, there is a greater possibility of an affirmative determination.”
Calls for case dismissal
There were also objections and requests for the case’s dismissal prior to Thursday’s decision.
Several interested parties, including Ternium USA, Ternium Mexico, and ArcelorMittal Dofasco, had requested Commerce dismiss the petitions without initiation.
Ternium said Commerce should disregard the “petitioners’ unsupported and unreliable industry support calculations,” according to case documents.
Or alternatively, it wanted the department to poll the industry to see if there really was enough domestic industry support for the inquiries.
In its request for dismissal of the petitions, ArcelorMittal Dofasco called the petition against Canada “unusual” because of the lack of support from other US producers. It accused petitioners of “spinning their estimates” in their favor.
“Given the demonstrated imprecision of the estimates that were used for this purpose, it would be simply unconscionable for Commerce not to poll the industry,” it stated.
Their comments were not enough for Commerce to dismiss the case without a proper investigation.
Next date to watch
The timeline Commerce provided for the case aligns with the schedule previously provided by SMU here. Note that any case delays and postponements may, and often do, extend the investigations.
The next big things to watch for are the ITC’s preliminary vote on Oct. 18 and preliminary injury determinations on Oct. 21. A negative initial injury diagnosis would terminate the corresponding AD/CVD investigations. Affirmative injury findings would keep the cases moving forward.
Editor’s note: This story has been updated to correctly state the four petitioners seeking duties against Mexico.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Fitch warns more tariffs will pressure global commodity markets
“New commodity-specific tariffs, mainly on steel and aluminum products, could widen price differentials and divert trade flows,” the credit agency forewarned.
Commerce increases import duties on Korean galv, plate
The Commerce Department is raising the import duties on imports of corrosion-resistant sheet and cut-to-length plate from Korea.
Leibowitz on trade: Why is protectionism so popular?
The world has had a few shocks recently. The CEO of a major health insurance company was gunned down in Manhattan. The 50-year Assad dynasty in Syria was pushed out less than two weeks after rebels started an offensive. And President-elect Trump is promising tariffs on everything a month before he takes office. But one shock has been taking place for a lot longer than the last few weeks. The 70-year consensus on trade hasn’t just been challenged. It’s been repudiated.
Ternium chief say Mexico tariffs ‘irrational’
Vedoya said the proposed tariffs are "an irrational measure that would harm both their own industry and ours."
Price on Trade: Trump tariffs are no negotiating tool – and could come at lightning speed
We focused on trade actions the second Trump administration might take in a prior column. Since then, we have learned more about the individuals who will be leading these efforts. Recent nominations reinforce the president-elect’s statements that tariffs will feature prominently in the second administration and that trade actions will be unveiled at lightning speed.