Trade Cases

Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins

Written by Laura Miller


Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel.

The case’s petitioners, Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI), Nucor, U.S. Steel, Wheeling-Nippon Steel, and the United Steelworkers (USW) union, filed the case on Sept. 5.

The case asserts that Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa have been dumping coated flat-rolled steel in the US at prices below market value.

The table below shows the dumping margins alleged in the petition reviewed by SMU.

CountryMin.Max.Average
Australia45.5%51.35%48.42%
Brazil47.0%99.5%75.7%
Canada19.1%51.3%35.0%
Mexico26.67%41.08%34.16%
Netherlands12.8%20.6%15.6%
South Africa51.96%52.02%51.99%
Taiwan67.9%
Turkey9.4%24.47%16.39%
UAE76.96%78.41%77.68%
Vietnam158.83%
Source: US International Trade Commission

The trade case petition also argues that producers in Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam have benefited from government subsidies.

Veteran trade attorney Roger Schagrin of Schagrin Associates and lead counsel for SDI and the USW told SMU, “While dumping cases require margin allegations, subsidy cases don’t.”

Subsidy cases “must contain evidence of the programs and use of the programs by foreign producers,” he said.

Petitioners believe they have laid out the evidence of those programs in their 9,000+ page case filing.

The Department of Commerce is tasked with determining the exact amounts of subsidies received during the period of investigation and then establishing the countervailable duty (CVD) rates.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) has scheduled a case hearing for Sept. 26 and its preliminary injury determination vote for Oct. 18.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect Mr. Schagrin’s position as lead counsel for two of the domestic petitioners, but not all.

Laura Miller

Read more from Laura Miller

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies

China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.