Trade Cases
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Written by Laura Miller
September 6, 2024
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel.
The case’s petitioners, Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI), Nucor, U.S. Steel, Wheeling-Nippon Steel, and the United Steelworkers (USW) union, filed the case on Sept. 5.
The case asserts that Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa have been dumping coated flat-rolled steel in the US at prices below market value.
The table below shows the dumping margins alleged in the petition reviewed by SMU.
| Country | Min. | Max. | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 45.5% | 51.35% | 48.42% |
| Brazil | 47.0% | 99.5% | 75.7% |
| Canada | 19.1% | 51.3% | 35.0% |
| Mexico | 26.67% | 41.08% | 34.16% |
| Netherlands | 12.8% | 20.6% | 15.6% |
| South Africa | 51.96% | 52.02% | 51.99% |
| Taiwan | – | – | 67.9% |
| Turkey | 9.4% | 24.47% | 16.39% |
| UAE | 76.96% | 78.41% | 77.68% |
| Vietnam | – | – | 158.83% |
The trade case petition also argues that producers in Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam have benefited from government subsidies.
Veteran trade attorney Roger Schagrin of Schagrin Associates and lead counsel for SDI and the USW told SMU, “While dumping cases require margin allegations, subsidy cases don’t.”
Subsidy cases “must contain evidence of the programs and use of the programs by foreign producers,” he said.
Petitioners believe they have laid out the evidence of those programs in their 9,000+ page case filing.
The Department of Commerce is tasked with determining the exact amounts of subsidies received during the period of investigation and then establishing the countervailable duty (CVD) rates.
The International Trade Commission (ITC) has scheduled a case hearing for Sept. 26 and its preliminary injury determination vote for Oct. 18.
Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect Mr. Schagrin’s position as lead counsel for two of the domestic petitioners, but not all.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.