Trade Cases

Commerce revises AD/CVD rates on Korean galv

Written by Laura Miller


The Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration issued the preliminary results of administrative reviews of the antidumping and countervailing duties (AD/CVDs) on corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) products from South Korea.

The preliminary results are mixed. Some companies’ dumping rates were adjusted upward, and some downward, while most countervailable subsidy rates ticked higher.

ITA intends to issue the final results of both reviews by Dec. 10.

Recall that South Korea has an absolute quota in place in lieu of Section 232 tariffs. Its 2024 hard limit is 183,326 short tons (st) of hot-dipped galvanized flat-rolled products and 210,366 st of coated flat-rolled products. Quarterly quotas are also in place. These limits can not be surpassed; excess material must be warehoused or shipped out of the country until the quarterly quota resets.

AD

Commerce preliminarily found that certain CORE products from Korea were sold in the US at prices below normal value during the one-year period of July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.

Period of review2022
calendar year
2021
calendar year
Producer/exporter
Dongbu companies5.49%6.48%
Hyundai companies0.80%0.82%
Posco companies2.68%1.60%
SeAH companies2.68%1.60%
ADs on corrosion-resistant steel products from the Republic of Korea
Source: Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration

CVD

Commerce’s preliminary determination is that countervailable subsidies are still being provided to CORE producers and exporters in Korea.

Period of reviewJuly 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022
Producer/exporter
Dongbu companies1.74%0.53%
Dongkuk companies1.74%0.53%
Hyundai companies0%0%
Posco companies1.74%0.53%
SeAH companies1.74%0.53%
CVDs on corrosion-resistant steel products from the Republic of Korea
Source: Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration

The CVD rate for the Hyundai group of companies continues to be 0% as it has had no shipments to review during the review periods.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect that South Korea has an absolute hard quota in place and not a tariff-rate quota, as was originally published.

Laura Miller

Read more from Laura Miller

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies

China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.