Steel Products

Op-ed: Near-zero emission steel a reality, governments must now step up
Written by Martin Pei
December 6, 2023
Steel used to be cited as a big sticking point in the energy transition, but this is no longer the case. Fossil-fuel-free steel is real and is being produced. However, immediate and enabling policy support is needed to scale up and roll out new technologies at scale.

The production of steel represents some 7% to 9% of global emissions and steel is needed everywhere — including to produce the infrastructure on which a net zero economy will rely. In other words, transforming the steel industry to abate its carbon dioxide emissions is vital to reach the Paris Agreement. It is also necessary for jobs and the European economy — the steel industry contributes some €110 billion ($118.67 billion) a year to the EU economy, employs around 330,000 people and supports a further 1.6 million jobs in related sectors.
Until recently, the technology to use 100 % fossil-free hydrogen, instead of coal or fossil gas, for the direct reduction of iron ore had never been shown. SSAB’s Hydrogen Breakthrough Ironmaking Technology (Hybrit) technology has shown at pilot scale, however, that a near-zero emissions alternative is possible. Working with LKAB, a Swedish mining firm, and power company Vattenfall, we have solved the green steel conundrum and, in 2022, we made our first fossil-free steel shipments, including to Volvo, which produced the first vehicle to be made with fossil-free steel.
However, last year’s shipment of 500 metric tons of fossil-free steel is a mere drop in the ocean compared to the 153 million metric tons of steel produced every year in the EU. Nonetheless, the fact this technology works is incredibly exciting and if governments work fast to introduce the right enabling policy frameworks, we can swiftly scale up production and help eliminate emissions.
First, to create a level playing field, governments must handle state aid with care to ensure support goes where it is needed without causing geopolitical problems. If used as a tool to support near-zero emission steel, state aid should focus on research and development and the growth of new technologies, and not be used to subsidize already commercially available technologies. We need to avoid a subsidy race within the EU and between international trade blocs.
Secondly, the EU, and some national governments, have already made a good start, but we would like to see wider regulatory reforms to improve and speed up the approval of permitting procedures for industrial plants and supporting infrastructure, like power grids, in all EU member states.
Thirdly, policymakers can help create markets for near-zero emission materials and products by working with standardisation bodies to create common methodologies on how to measure, report and verify carbon emissions. This step is important to create transparency around decarbonisation efforts for all steelmaking production processes and to protect and enhance the credibility of the steel industry’s greenhouse gas emissions reporting. Customers and consumers need to be able to understand and compare the carbon intensity of all steel products.
Already, many companies, including Volvo, Mercedes-Benz, Alfa Laval and Polestar, are working with us on how fossil-free steel can help them create fossil-free value chains that enable them to reduce their Scope 3 emissions in line with reporting and disclosure rules. And it is clear that our customers are willing to pay a premium for fossil-free steel for this very reason.
Further, we need greater clarity from policymakers about the path away from fossil fuels and towards net zero. We need to see them implementing actions that make it more costly for companies which continue to emit in line with business-as-usual. To this end, global carbon pricing mechanisms are needed to set the foundation for faster industrial decarbonization.
Finally, the industrial transition is dependent on access to fossil-free energy inputs, especially electrification. We therefore call on governments to prioritize a faster roll-out of fossil-free electricity production and transmission grids.
Technology was a difficult barrier we had to overcome to decarbonize steel, and through dedicated research and development work, we have succeeded at pilot scale. Fossil-free steel is a reality. But to demonstrate that it can be produced at an industrial scale, we need both government and first movers to help aggregate demand. More demand-side interest and orders will bring down costs and justify a broader industry shift in production from fossil fuel to near-zero emission steel, with important benefits for the environment and the economy.

Martin Pei
Read more from Martin PeiLatest in Steel Products

Nucor keeps HRC price unchanged
Nucor paused its weekly hot-rolled (HR) coil price this week, keeping it flat for the first time since Jan. 21. This comes after a nine-week rally that saw the company increase prices by double-digits for eight of those weeks.

Nucor increases plate prices by $40/ton
Nucor aims to increase prices for steel plate by $40 per short ton (st) with the opening of its May order book. The Charlotte, N.C.-based steelmaker said the increase was effective with new orders received on Friday, March 28, in a letter to customers dated the same day. The company said the price hike applied […]

US CRC price gains ground over imports
US cold-rolled (CR) coil prices increased again this week, while offshore prices declined.

SMU Steel Demand Index momentum slows
Steel Market Update is pleased to share this Premium content with Executive members. Contact info@steelmarketupdate.com for information on how to upgrade to a Premium-level subscription. Growth in SMU’s Steel Demand Index eased in March after reaching a four-year high in late February. Despite a moderate gain, the index remains in expansion territory. The Steel Demand […]

Leibowitz: Impact of tariffs on US manufacturers
On February 10, President Trump announced a massive restructuring of tariffs on steel and aluminum. Those changes took effect on March 12, and they will impact US manufacturing. What will the impact be? Bye-bye exclusions Perhaps the most important change, which hits imports from all countries, is the loss of a product exclusion process to […]