Trade Cases

USTR Applauds WTO Report on Section 232 Tariffs

Written by Ethan Bernard

August 17, 2023

The office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) endorsed the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) panel report regarding the Section 232 duties against China on steel and aluminum. The report recognized the duties as “security measures,” rejecting China’s arguments against them.

“The United States is pleased with the WTO panel report released today, recognizing that the US Section 232 actions on steel and aluminum are security measures, and that the People’s Republic of China illegally retaliated with sham ‘safeguard tariffs,’” USTR spokesperson Sam Michel said in a press release on Wednesday.

Michel said that China’s decision to pursue this dispute “highlights its hypocrisy by both suing the United States in the WTO and at the same time unilaterally retaliating with tariffs.” 

“The panel rightly rejected China’s argument that the US Section 232 actions are safeguard measures that may be ‘rebalanced’ under WTO rules,” Michel added.  

Further, USTR believes China’s use of the WTO dispute settlement system to challenge the US Section 232 national security actions “has caused grave systemic damage to the WTO.” 

“The WTO does not have the authority to second-guess a WTO member’s response to threats to its security, and WTO reform must ensure that issues of national security cannot be reviewed in WTO dispute settlement,” Michel’s statement said.

Ethan Bernard

Ethan Bernard is a reporter and editor for Steel Market Update. He previously worked for American Metal Market as a copy editor in the New York office for two years starting in 2008. Later, he copy edited AMM’s monthly magazine on a freelance basis from 2015 until 2017. With experience in financial copywriting and textbook publishing, he holds a BA in Comparative Literature from UC Berkeley, and an MFA. in Creative Writing from New York University. He can be reached at ethan@steelmarketupdate.com or 724-759-7871.

Read more from Ethan Bernard

Latest in Trade Cases

Price on trade: The excess capacity threat moves closer to home

The Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) reaffirmed on Oct. 8 what domestic steel producers have long known—the threat of excess steel capacity never disappeared and is evolving. China’s steelmakers are boosting capacity and exports, echoing the 2016 global steel crisis. There is no doubt that China is successfully weaponizing excess capacity across many industries, and the fatal damage to domestic production and national security undermines the interests of all market-oriented countries. The question now is: How will GFSEC countries respond?