Final Thoughts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/487b5/487b5184ae0bba5778e0c0728dd2f5eba9a059c4" alt=""
Letter to the Editor: Accounting Is Not a Trick
Written by Tim Triplett
January 17, 2022
I was reading your Final Thoughts and appreciated most of your comments, but I have some major issues with the inaccuracy of this paragraph.
“Accounting tricks like inventory write-downs can help narrow the gap between a service center’s cost for steel and what a customer is willing to pay for it. But some losses are inevitable, at least until the price declines begin to plateau.”
(See Tim Triplett’s Final Thoughts on Jan. 16.)
Writing down the value of inventory before it is sold is not an accounting trick. How is recording a loss an accounting trick? Ignoring a loss is an accounting trick.
When a company writes down the value of its inventory, it is recognizing a loss before it is sold. If it buys a coil for $2,000/ton and it is only worth $1,500/ton at some point later on, it is required to recognize that loss at the time the market value is lower than the cost. If a company does not do this, it is overstating its income.
What many companies have done in the past is to ignore these market movements, hold onto the expensive coils in the hope the market would move back up, and flip new steel that it is buying closer to the market – making it appear they are making margin and ignoring the large losses that it has yet to realize in its inventory.
In markets that have had extended negative market fluctuations, this has killed off several companies when ultimately the old expensive inventory became too old to be eligible in the company’s borrowing base or had to be marked down.
By not marking its inventory down correctly, a company is reporting an inflated balance sheet, inflated borrowing base and an inflated income statement.
Service Center CFO
(Name Withheld on Request)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/813df/813df35f5ee519ec73fbbf019efaf3c51daadc97" alt=""
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Final Thoughts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/918fd/918fdd48206addf28e2338c575f9181bb06becac" alt=""
Final Thoughts
Some of you have told me that the current market feels about as crazy as early 2021 when demand snapped back after the initial outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Others have said it might be more like late February/early March 2022, when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine – and, in the process, caused […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ab34/8ab34ff580a801f1bd16845637ea97bda891fae3" alt="Ethan Bernard, SMU Team"
Final Thoughts
To say we’ve entered a “Brave New World” since Jan. 20 might be an exaggeration, but we’ve definitely entered a different one.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/918fd/918fdd48206addf28e2338c575f9181bb06becac" alt=""
Final Thoughts
I think it’s fair to say that the last few weeks – and last week especially – have been among the most intense for any of us covering steel (or aluminum).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ab34/8ab34ff580a801f1bd16845637ea97bda891fae3" alt="Ethan Bernard, SMU Team"
Final Thoughts
A look at how SMU survey respondents are reacting to President Trump's recent actions on tariffs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/918fd/918fdd48206addf28e2338c575f9181bb06becac" alt=""
Final Thoughts
A lot of the changes basically entail rolling back what I’ll call, for fun, Section 232 Lite. S232 Lite resulted from watering down what I’ll call OG S232 – the one first imposed in March 2018 - with exemptions and exclusions over the years. Now, OG Section 232, is back with its across-the-board 25% tariffs against everyone.