Steel Mills
Buyers Ponder Merger of Major Integrated Mills
Written by Tim Triplett
September 29, 2020
Cleveland-Cliffs’ purchase of ArcelorMittal USA took many steel buyers by surprise this week. Initial reactions from some Steel Market Update readers ranged from “a major development” to “business as usual.” Here are some of their comments:
“Quite surprised by this development. Initial reaction is this gives them an incredibly strong position with automotive. Not sure about other end-use markets. This additional consolidation does not guarantee pricing power as there is still plenty of competition in the North American market.”
“Consolidation should overall be a net positive for the market. We are curious to see if this will materially change Mittal’s approach to the market. Do they become more focused on higher-value products and less concerned about the core HR market and more specifically the service center customer base? Or is that simply a result of some capacity rationalization? With the auto companies seeing their buy consolidated, does this further open the door for Nucor, SDI and Big River to gain market share in the automotive segment? Does this materially change their cost structure and allow them to compete more effectively with the EAF mills? My personal belief is that integrated mills will continue to lose share over time. The service/performance of these mills leaves a fair amount to be desired (at least from a service center perspective) and proof will be in the pudding if that changes.”
“This was an expected consolidation. However, it potentially creates a monopoly issue and I’m hearing automotive companies may not be happy with it. Cliffs acquiring old technology is concerning and the deal leaves out Calvert, which is getting a new EAF. That doesn’t make sense to me.”
“Lourenco’s [Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves’] MO is to dominate. AK’s MO was to dominate. AMUSA’s MO was to dominate. What changes except for the ownership and size of the predator?”
“Nothing like going all in on BOF technology. It creates a downstream customer for Cleveland-Cliffs. And we believe auto and appliance sectors will see some steep increases in cost for 2021 and beyond as this new venture was dominant in those areas. We expect the sales percentage to distribution to be less in 2021 with the new company.”
“It was a surprise to many. Kept under wraps very well. Can’t help but wonder if Goncalves had dialogue with USS also. I don’t think it’s ‘business as usual’ at the new company.”
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Steel Mills
USS confirms split CFIUS decision on Nippon deal; it’s now up to Biden
Nippon Steel's purchase of U.S. Steel could lead to lower steel output domestically, and that presents “a national security risk," the Washington Post reported.
USS/Nippon deal: Who will have the happiest holidays?
Will Santa bring gifts for the leadership, employees, and shareholders of U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel, and lumps of coal for USW leadership and politicians opposed to the deal?
‘Orderly liquidation’ of AHMSA assets begins
A trustee has formally taken over AHMSA and begun the liquidation process of the bankrupt Mexican steelmaker.
Nippon buying stake in Canadian iron ore project
Nippon Steel and a Japanese trading company have entered an agreement to buy a 49% interest in a Champion Iron ore project in Canada.
USS anticipates Q4 loss on weak demand, BR2 start-up
Amid a challenging pricing and demand environment, and with the ongoing ramp-up of the Big River 2 mill, USS is anticipating a loss for the fourth quarter.