Trade Cases

Currency Manipulation to Be Subject to Countervailing Duties

Written by Sandy Williams


A new regulation from the U.S. Department of Commerce allows currency manipulation by foreign governments to be considered a subsidy subject to countervailing duties.

“This Currency Rule is an important step in ensuring that unfair trade practices are properly remedied,” said Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross. “While successive administrations have balked at countervailing foreign currency subsidies, the Trump administration is taking action to level the playing field for American businesses and workers.”

A countervailable subsidy is defined by Commerce as a “financial contribution from a government or public entity that is specific and provides a benefit to a foreign producer or exporter.”

The new regulation identifies certain criteria that Commerce would use to determine if countervailing duties should be imposed in cases of currency under-valuation.

“In assessing whether there has been such government action, Commerce will not normally include monetary and related credit policy of an independent central bank or monetary authority,” said the Department. “Commerce will seek and generally defer to Treasury’s expertise in currency matters.”

Currently, Commerce maintains 515 antidumping and countervailing duty orders on a variety of products. During the Trump administration, 198 antidumping and countervailing duty investigations were initiated, up from 168 percent from the comparable period in the Obama administration.

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies

China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.