Trade Cases
AAM: China Deal “Completely Inadequate”
Written by Sandy Williams
January 13, 2020
The Alliance for American Manufacturing is more than a little skeptical that the China Phase One trade agreement will have value for American workers, calling it “completely inadequate” in a letter to President Trump.
“The agreement does not level the playing field for American workers in the U.S. or global market,” wrote AAM President Scott Paul in the letter. “With nearly all the major structural issues left unresolved – including industrial subsidies, overcapacity, state-owned enterprises, predatory investment, currency manipulation and misalignment, cyber intrusions, worker rights, environmental rules, and tax policy – we urge an immediate resumption of negotiations and sustained economic pressure.
“For far too long, seemingly endless dialogue with China proved that polite requests to curtail its predatory, state-driven industrial policies do not yield meaningful results. Left to its own devices, China has repeatedly demonstrated that it is unwilling to hold up its end of the bargain,” added Paul.
AAM gave credit to the Trump administration for recognizing that the U.S. and China have a flawed economic relationship, and for taking strong measures to encourage negotiations.
China’s “predatory economic behavior” has resulted in a $5 trillion bilateral goods trade deficit, including a record $419.2 billion in 2018, noted Paul, along with the loss of 54,000 manufacturing facilities and 3.7 million jobs. “These trends are unsustainable and put the future of our economy, national security, and country at risk,” he added.
“While the phase one deal falls short, the use of tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 have proven to be an effective and appropriate tool to trigger negotiations with China,” Paul wrote.
“American workers and U.S. manufacturing companies need a deal that is comprehensive, specific, enforceable and backed by strong and automatic penalties if Beijing fails to live up to its words – as has repeatedly been the case under previous administrations of both political parties. It is essential that we maintain pressure on China, using the leverage of remaining Section 301 tariffs to immediately resume negotiations on a phase two agreement.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The tariff carousel becomes the tariff rollercoaster
The administration’s trade rollercoaster is moving at record speeds, running along the rails of innovation and expansion. But it can be confusing and difficult to keep up with. US manufacturers that follow these developments closely could benefit from the ride. Companies that miss new updates, or fail to accurately interpret their duty liability, could be left feeling queasy. Some rollercoasters are not for the faint of heart, and this one is a bit like Space Mountain. We are all riding without much ability to see the next turn or drop.
Ten OCTG importers found guilty of duty evasion
Ten US importers are on the hook to pay two years’ worth of anti-dumping and countervailing duties that US Customs says they had tried to illegally evade.
Canada, Mexico get 30-day delay on blanket tariffs (again)
The latest on the trade war
Mexico launches HR steel dumping probe at Ternium’s request
Mexico has launched an anti-dumping investigation into imports of hot-rolled steel from China and Vietnam.
Trump vows tariffs and reciprocal levies in speech to Congress
April 2 is when reciprocal tariffs are expected to kick in.