Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
Written by John Packard
September 16, 2019
For those of you who are not aware, my Final Thoughts is an area where I will sometimes provide my opinion or view of the marketplace. Understand that these are my comments and are not coming from any steel mills, service centers, trading companies or the financial community. You can take them or leave them; that is your choice. They are being provided in order to stimulate discussion within the steel community or within your company.
I was told by a couple of sources today that General Motors produces about 7,400 cars per day (during a 5-day work work) based on total U.S. annual production of 10,990,938 vehicles and with GM having 17.5 percent of the total U.S. production.
If the average steel sheet usage is 1.25 tons per vehicle prior to scrap (trucks would be higher, cars lower) then a ballpark tonnage per day would be 9,250 net tons of sheet usage taken out of the market by the GM strike. However, with 12-week rolling production schedules, the steel to be used for today’s vehicles is already on the floor either at the mills, service centers, toll processors or the manufacturing plants. Remember, GM is not necessarily tied to a single steel mill supplier, so these tons are most likely spread over a number of mills.
The question becomes – at what point do the integrated steel mills have to go to the spot market to replace some of these lost tons? I don’t have an answer to that question, but it is something we will need to watch carefully as this strike unfolds. For now, let’s hope there is a quick settlement, because any strike lasting much longer than a week or two could be very disruptive to the spot markets. Maintenance schedules and other measures could be used to minimize the short-term impact. So, stay tuned. No need to panic right now.
We are hearing rumors (and we are identifying this information as nothing more than a rumor at this point) that the Koch brothers, and potentially the Arkansas teachers’ pension fund, are looking at selling all or pieces of their investment in Big River Steel. This rumor has been circulating and continues to do so without much substance associated with it.
I will make this comment – from my viewpoint and opinion (not from any mill perspective) it would make sense for an integrated producer to purchase Big River Steel (if it is indeed being marketed at this time). Why it makes sense to me is: 1) location, 2) EAF production flexibility, 3) allows for closure of outdated capacity, 4) competitive reasons.
At the same time, there are a lot of questions that go along with any of the integrated mills buying controlling interest in BRS: 1) financing the purchase, 2) union vs. non-union, 3) management style, 4) integration of sales. I am sure there are many more issues that could prove to be sticking points to any potential deal.
As I said at the beginning, this is just a rumor and there have been many about Big River Steel over the past two years. For now, I suggest you stay tuned.
For the first time since we started analyzing service center flat rolled and plate steel inventories, we reported the results to our Premium level members yesterday as well as our data providers. Every month we will report on the number of days of supply of flat rolled and sheet to those subscribing to our Premium service. If you are interested in learning more, I recommend you speak to Paige Mayhair who can be reached at 724-720-1012 or by email at Paige@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Our October Steel 101 workshop is totally sold out and has a waiting list. Registration is open for our next workshop, which will be in Ontario, Calif., on Jan. 7-8. We will be touring the California Steel Industries steel mill as part of that workshop. You can find more information about the workshop at www.SteelMarketUpdate.com/Events/Steel101
As always, your business is truly appreciated by all of us here at Steel Market Update.
John Packard, President & CEO
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
The whole SMU team is packing up our laptops and our SMU polos/cardigans, loading up the PowerPoint slides, and preparing to make the trek down to Florida for the Tampa Steel Conference. There will be plenty to talk about!
Final Thoughts
From one group of folks, I’ve heard that Trump might not wait until Feb. 1 – the date he threatened on to place tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico. They say he could act as soon as Friday. And then there are those who don’t think anything will happen before April 1. That’s the deadline for Commerce, Treasury, and USTR to submit key reports on “America First Trade Policy” to President Trump.
Final Thoughts
Trump made a clarification in a speech on Monday. Previously, he had declared the word “tariff” the most beautiful word in the dictionary. No longer.
Final Thoughts
President Donald Trump on Sunday hammered Colombia with 25% tariffs and threatened to increase them to 50%. Trump in a post on Truth Social said he took the action not because of a trade dispute but because the South American nation had refused to accept planes carrying deported immigrants. The president also cited "national security" concerns, just as he did to justify 25% Section 232 tariffs on steel in his first term. Even the 50% threat echoes his first term. Turkish steel, like that of most nations, was assessed a 25% tariff in March 2018. Trump doubled Turkey's tariff to 50% via a tweet in August of that year over a matter unrelated to steel.
Final Thoughts
We surveyed many of you this week and asked what you wanted to see from the new Trump administration. Responses were varied but fell largely into three groups: tariffs and trade policy, the Nippon-U.S. Steel deal, and those who are concerned about too much government sway in steel. Some also expressed hope that President Trump would continue the infrastructure spending that began under former President Biden.