Trade Cases
Letter to the Editor: Trader Sees Damage to Mills from Section 232
Written by Tim Triplett
September 4, 2019
Steel Market Update received the following letter from a trading company executive and we thought it should be shared with our readers:
I was just reading your article concerning Section 232 and came up with the following short conclusions:
The damage of Section 232 to the integrated mills is done. The windfall profit reaped by the mills in 2018 has been reinvested by Nucor, SDI, Big River and North Star Bluescope in new modern capacity, thereby expediting the demise of old inefficient facilities. The restart of already shuttered older mills only added to the problem.
If the purpose of Section 232 was truly for national security reasons to keep a financially healthy steel industry, then the jury is still out on the success of the program. Yes, more modern production will come on stream in the U.S. (and North America), and that is a good thing. Nevertheless, steel mills die hard, and Nucor, SDI, et al, will have to be patient to reap the benefits of their quick action as they will have to endure the steel downturn that is more than likely coming as inefficient excess capacity will need to be taken out of the market (again). As for the integrated mills, Section 232 did not do them any favors that I can see.
I really doubt that import levels will change much going forward, regardless of what happens with Section 232, or even the dumping suits that will likely follow.
Trading Company Executive
(name withheld on request)
You are welcome to comment. To do so send your comments to info@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.