Economy

Coalition Warns of Economic Damage from Mexico Border Closure

Written by Sandy Williams


President Trump’s now aborted threat this week to close the Mexican border over immigration prompted a coalition of industries to express their concerns about border trade. In a letter sent to National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow and Director of the Office of Management and Budget Mick Mulvaney, the coalition discussed the need for all cross-border freight traffic to flow unimpeded and highlighted the economic damage that a full or partial border closure would cause. The letter follows:

Dear Mr. Kudlow and Mr. Mulvaney:

The undersigned associations representing the agricultural sector, the auto industry, chemical manufacturers, the freight rail industry, and the trucking industry write to express serious concerns with any new burdens that would slow down or delay the movement of commercial goods across the U.S.-Mexico border. We strongly agree that a secure border is critical to our national security. However, we firmly believe that our nation can secure our borders without impeding the free flow of two-way commerce. As the Administration continues efforts to protect and secure our nation’s borders, all cross-border freight traffic, whether by truck or rail, must be allowed to flow unimpeded.

We appreciate the Administration’s efforts to modernize U.S. trade agreements, including the recently negotiated United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Lowering trade barriers and improving market access for U.S. exports will help grow the U.S. economy and strengthen our competitiveness in the global market. However, a partial or full closure of the U.S.-Mexico border will undermine any potential success that may be achieved through this new agreement.

Closing or limiting the free flow of goods on the U.S.-Mexican border will inflict significant harm to our nation’s economy and the millions of American jobs that depend on cross-border trade. For instance, the auto sector – and the 10 million jobs it supports – relies upon the North American supply chain and cross-border commerce to remain globally competitive and a forced shutdown of auto assembly plants due to a border closure would cost the auto industry billions of dollars per day.

Further, North American trade supports 50,000 agriculture jobs and $13 billion in gross domestic product, and Mexico is America’s second largest export market for food and agriculture products. Additionally, Mexico is the top export market for U.S. manufactured chemicals – resulting in $543 million worth of chemical products crossing the U.S.-Mexico border every week.

For the companies responsible for transporting these goods, more than 42 percent of carloads and intermodal moved by America’s freight railroads are directly related to international trade, which in turn supports 50,000 well-paying railroad jobs. Just to haul freight to and from Mexico, the American trucking industry employs more than 31,000 truck drivers and more than 47,000 workers, generating $6.6 billion in revenue last year.

Unfortunately, any disruption to the flow of commerce resulting from the full or partial closure of our border would have a cascading effect – harming U.S. consumers, threatening American jobs and investment, and curtailing the economic progress that the Administration has worked to reignite. The Commerce Department estimates that $502 billion in goods — about $1.4 billion each day — crossed the U.S.-Mexico border through trucks and trains last year.

We particularly caution against any reallocation of resources away from commercial ports of entry that would slow cross-border traffic. As we learned from the nine-month labor dispute in 2014-2015 that crippled shipments at 29 West Coast ports and cost the economy upwards of $2.5 billion per day, even short-term disruptions have long-term consequences. Even more devastating, the 11-day shutdown of port operations in 2002 had an estimated $15.6 billion cumulative effect on the entire U.S supply chain, with some freight migrating away from the West Coast permanently.

The closure of the U.S.-Mexico border would jeopardize the economic growth our country has seen over the last 27 months and negatively impact American consumers and businesses. We stand ready to provide input to you and others in the Administration as you work to advance policies that promote economic growth for our nation, while preserving cross-border trade.

Sincerely,  

Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers

American Association of Exporters and Importers

American Automotive Policy Council

American International Automobile Dealers Association

American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association

American Trucking Associations

Association of American Railroads

Association of Global Automakers

Auto Care Association

National Grain and Feed Association

Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association

North American Export Grain Association

Pet Food Institute

Railway Supply Institute

Society of Chemical Manufacturers & Affiliates

Specialty Equipment Market Association

The Fertilizer Institute

Truck & Engine Manufacturers

cc:       The Honorable Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of Commerce

The Honorable Steven Mnuchin, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury

The Honorable Kirstjen Nielsen, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security

Latest in Economy

CRU: Dollar and bond yields rise, metal prices fall as Trump wins election

Donald Trump has won the US presidential election. The Republican party has re-taken control of the Senate. Votes are still being counted in many tight congressional races. But based on results so far, the Republicans seem likely to maintain control of the House of Representatives. If confirmed, this will give Trump considerable scope to pass legislation pursuing his agenda. What this means for US policy is not immediately obvious. Trump will not be inaugurated until Jan. 20. In the coming weeks and months, he will begin to assemble his cabinet, which may give a clearer signal on his policy priorities and approaches. Based on statements he made during the presidential campaign, we have set out the likely direction of his economic policy here and green policy here.