Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: Who's Now Who in Washington
Written by John Packard
January 6, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
This is an update on the trade-related committees in the new Congress.
The Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee are the congressional bodies with jurisdiction over most international trade matters.
Senate
The new chairman of the Finance Committee is Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa. He replaces Senator Orin Hatch of Utah, who retired at the end of the 115th Congress.
There are five new members of the Finance Committee, which in the 116th Congress will have 28 members, 15 Republicans and 13 Democrats. There were 14 Republicans and 13 Democrats on the committee in the last Congress.
New members include: Republicans Lankford (Oklahoma), Daines (Montana) and Young (Indiana); and Democrats Hassan (New Hampshire) and Cortez Masto (Nevada). Outgoing members from the 115th Congress include Republicans Hatch (Utah), who retired, and Heller (Nevada), who was defeated. Outgoing Democrats are Nelson (Florida) and McCaskill (Missouri), who were defeated.
House of Representatives
The new roster of the House Ways and Means Committee was released last week and, due to the new Democratic majority, there was quite a lot of turnover. The committee remains at 42 members, but the Democratic and Republican ratio was flipped—24 Democrats and 16 Republicans now are members.
The new chairman of the full committee is Richard Neal, Democrat of Massachusetts. The ranking member is Kevin Brady, Republican of Texas, who chaired the committee in the last Congress.
Ten new Democrats were named to Ways and Means, including: Gwen Moore (Wisconsin), Dan Kildee (Michigan), Brendan Boyle (Pennsylvania), Don Beyer (Virginia), Dwight Evans (Pennsylvania), Tom Suozzi (New York), Jimmy Panetta (California), Stephanie Murphy (Florida), Brad Schneider (Illinois) and Steven Horsford (Nevada). The new makeup of the Republican side, which will be sharply diminished, has not yet been announced.
The Trade Subcommittee consisted of 15 members in the 115th Congress (9 Republicans and 6 Democrats). The new roster is still in formation; it appears that the ratios on the Subcommittee will reverse, with 9 Democrats and 6 Republicans on the panel.
The chairman of the Subcommittee is likely to be chosen in the coming week. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (Oregon) and Bill Pascrell (New Jersey) are vying for the position. I hope I can give concrete information on the makeup of the Trade Subcommittee soon.
The new blood on these committees could change the focus of the Subcommittee’s agenda. The turnover on the House side is huge. President Trump’s trade agenda will be questioned vigorously on the House side. A number of trade deals will doubtless be scrutinized.
Key Dates in the Next Two Months
Feb. 17—statutory deadline for issuance of the Commerce report on national security and the automotive and auto parts industries (270 days after initiation).
March 2—deadline for concluding an agreement with China regarding trade practices. Failure to reach a deal could lead to new tariffs on China, and new retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports.
March 15 (approximate)—the Government Accountability Office (GAO) will commence a study into the product exclusion processes for the 232 (steel and aluminum) and 301 (China) tariffs. The study was announced in December.
Many other milestones are likely during the first quarter in the new Congress. It could be a very busy time.
In the meantime, the partial government shutdown continues….
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.