Trade Cases
Retaliatory Tariffs Aimed at Trump Base
Written by Sandy Williams
October 11, 2018
Retaliatory tariffs are taking aim at those sectors that have been the strongest supporters of President Trump. An analysis of data by the Brookings Institution reports that 6.1 percent of U.S. exports, or $121 billion worth of goods, are now subject to tariffs by China, the European Union, Canada and Mexico.
The Trump administration has levied punitive tariffs of about $250 billion on Chinese goods, as well as tariffs on steel and aluminum exports from its North American partners, the EU and others. China has responded with retaliatory tariffs on over $101 billion worth of U.S. goods. Canada has targeted $12.8 billion of U.S. exports, Mexico $3.5 billion and the EU $3.3 billion.
“Trade policy is inextricably linked with politics, and the retaliatory tariffs seem geographically and industrially targeted to mobilize political angst,” said Brookings.
Agricultural regions in the U.S were hit hard by retaliatory tariffs, particularly in regions of high GOP and Trump support. Pork and soybeans in Sen. Charles Grassley’s home state of Iowa were targeted as were cranberries from Rep. Paul Ryan’s constituents in Wisconsin. Whiskey exports were hit with a 25 percent tariff in Sen. Mitch McConnell’s home state Kentucky. After Trump lauded “made in America” Harley Davidson, the EU targeted the iconic motorcycle manufacturer resulting in the company moving some production overseas.
Retaliatory tariffs also impact the metals industries and certain manufacturing sectors. Regions at the top of the list for tariff exposure include Birmingham, Ala., Nashville, Tenn., and Toledo, Ohio.
Brookings found that counties that voted for Trump are exposed to 8.1 percent of the retaliatory tariffs compared to 4.2 percent of exports from industries in counties that voted for Clinton. Rural and small towns, the Trump base, are hit hardest by tariffs.
Brookings also estimates that tariffs will affect about 294,000 direct export jobs and 354,000 jobs that are supported by the export industry. In total, nearly 650,000 jobs will be impacted by the tariffs. Brookings notes that the numbers are not necessarily estimates of anticipated job loss.
“This analysis provides a look at how regions and states are positioned given their distinctive firms and industries, an important starting point that provides greater understanding to subnational leaders of how a significant macroeconomic policy change influences their place,” said the research firm.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.