Steel Markets
Trump Proposes Easing Vehicle Emissions Standards
Written by Tim Triplett
August 12, 2018
What would ultimately be best for the environment: strict fuel efficiency standards that will dramatically reduce the tailpipe emissions from new vehicles or more achievable standards that will add less cost to each vehicle and allow more drivers to upgrade and get older gas guzzlers off the road?
Over the strong objections of environmental groups and with tepid support from the auto industry, the Trump administration is proposing to lower the target for automotive emissions. Last week, the EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released a notice of proposed rulemaking that would freeze vehicle emissions standards at 2020 levels through 2026.
The Obama-era rules enacted in 2012 call for automakers to achieve a Corporate Average Fuel Economy of more than 50 miles per gallon by 2025. The administration’s current proposal would cap the increases at 2020 levels of about 43.7 mpg under the complicated CAFE formula. Trump’s proposal, which is subject to a 60-day public comment period, would significantly lower the longer-term requirements through 2026 to a real-world average of around 37 mpg.
Under Trump’s new 50-state fuel economy and tailpipe carbon dioxide emissions standard for passenger cars and light trucks, the state of California would no longer be able to take the lead in setting environmental standards, which are often emulated by other states and effectively set the mark for automakers.
The administration claims that keeping in place the standards finalized in 2012 would add $2,340 to the average cost of each vehicle, putting a new car out of reach for many American families. “We are delivering on President Trump’s promise to the American public that his administration would address and fix the current fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards,” said EPA Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “Our proposal aims to strike the right regulatory balance based on the most recent information and create a 50-state solution that will enable more Americans to afford newer, safer vehicles that pollute less. More realistic standards can save lives while continuing to improve the environment.”
Opponents of the proposal dispute the administration’s claims there would be a net benefit to the environment. California officials and various environmental interests have vowed to sue the Trump administration and fight the loosening of emissions standards.
Although the auto industry has been struggling to meet the current rules, it is hesitant to back weaker environmental standards for fear of a public backlash. In a joint statement from the Auto Alliance and Global Automakers, the industry trade groups stopped short of endorsing the administration’s proposal. “Automakers support continued improvements in fuel economy and flexibilities that incentivize advanced technologies while balancing priorities like affordability, safety, jobs and the environment. With today’s release of the administration’s proposals, it’s time for substantive negotiations to begin. We urge California and the federal government to find a common sense solution that sets continued increases in vehicle efficiency standards while also meeting the needs of America’s drivers.”
The steel and aluminum industries are more than just bystanders to the debate. The automakers’ need to make vehicles lighter and more fuel efficient has also fueled dramatic innovation in the development of advanced high-strength steel and aluminum alloys now commonly used in vehicle designs. The American Iron and Steel Institute supports the change in emissions standards. “We strongly believe that a well-crafted CAFE/GHG program can result in fuel efficient, safe vehicles, and protect our environment without burdening consumers with prohibitively high-priced vehicles or harming employment in the U.S. manufacturing sector,” said Thomas J. Gibson, AISI president and CEO. “We appreciate NHTSA and EPA’s consideration of all these factors in the development of this proposal. As this regulatory program is finalized, we will continue to partner with our customers in the auto sector to provide innovative and cost-effective solutions to their lightweighting efforts.”
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Steel Markets
Steady architecture billings signal improving conditions
The November ABI decreased month over month but was still the third-highest reading of the past two years.
Fitch warns more tariffs will pressure global commodity markets
“New commodity-specific tariffs, mainly on steel and aluminum products, could widen price differentials and divert trade flows,” the credit agency forewarned.
Slowing data center, warehouse planning drives decline in Dodge index
The Dodge Momentum Index (DMI) slid further in November as planning for data centers and warehouses continued to decline.
Latin America’s steel industry grapples with declining demand, rising imports
With climbing imports and falling consumption, the Latin American steel industry has had a challenging 2024, according to an Alacero report.
CRU: Trump tariffs could stimulate steel demand
Now that the dust has settled from the US election, as have the immediate reactions in the equity, bond, and commodity markets, this is a prime opportunity to look at how a second Trump presidency might affect the US steel market.